The reason why the Brook/Rios fight did not happen.

:rofl:rofl:rofl

If that's not good enough what can anybody possibly show you that is proof?

And you made a thread claiming Brook did all this so prove us all wrong and show us the proof you have then?

Shut me up please, you will end the debate if you provide anything of value.


So what you got? :yep

 

you fool, zero credibility, none, embarrassing.

Im actually embarrassed for you

 

Embarrassed yourself. Let it go, learn from it, don't make stupid threads.

You just told me YouTube links are not good enough, you were basically saying "is that all you got, a link from YouTube" you wanted something more official, well you got it and the best you have is f***ing YouTube link from the same man who said it was the BBBofC :rofl

Your stupidity defies belief.

You wanted proof, Mr M provided better proof than I had, a letter from the BBBofC and all you have is that?

I am not worried about a date, that is not the issue, the issue was/is you providing a link to anything credible that back up the thread title, that proves it was Brook or even Hearn, what you are doing is assuming, making stuff up because you can't prove what you say.

:hi: it's been waved off, you got stopped.

 

You got slumped brother is stunning fashion, I can't even take credit either but I can laugh at you

No we don't think anything really, you made a statement, made a thread claiming it was Brook, all us Brits have asked for is proof? Show us where you got this information and you can't so you act like this.

I don't think that's a lot to ask really, I haven't made any outrageous requests, just a link to where you got got this information.

Until you prove what you posted is true then all we can say it is coincidence because you have no proof or haven't been kind enough to show us it.

And you still are not going to show us anything proving Brook and Hearn were responsible? Nothing? Not a thing?

OK, we'll have a nice day

 

Owned For what? By who?

For asking you to prove what you claimed to be fact and you not being able to do it is me getting "owned".

:good and I'm not going to get a welcome to the world of no logic?

You said Brook had direct influence on the glove issue, I asked for proof, a link, information.

All you have done is give an OPINION. That is not a fact, that is not proof, it is an OPINION,.

Want me to walk you through that again? Slowly?

Do you know the difference between a fact and an opinion?

See this is where I believe you are MVC, he has no understanding of the words assuming, claims, facts and the way you type, the structure of your sentences and certain phrases make it obvious really.

 

FFS, i will put this to rest right now...!!!

Everyone, or pretty much everyone knows I am a part of Team Kingpin....we were told back in JANUARY 2015 that Everlast mx and possibly Reeboks were on the docket to be banned in the UK...!!!

We were given the option to decline the fight, have our sponsor Everlast give us an exemption to use another pair (Hearns did pay us for changing gloves)

We made the decision to wear Cleto Reyes gloves for the Anthony Joshua fight...!!!

We had a choice of Cleto Reyes, Grant or Ediroc gloves...!!!


This has nothing to do with Rios vs Brook...!!!

 

Watch the video? You said that a video wasn't good enough before, you wanted more than a video from YouTube now that's all you have

you have an OPINION, that's great, that's what a site like this should be about, opinions but they are not facts.

Again I will walk you through it, an opinion is not a fact. Do you understand that simple thing?