I'm well aware of how a boxing match is scored, if you can score that fight a draw you're not looking at it objectively. Without the knockdowns that fight was a shutout, with the knockdowns Hopkins still should've won by atleast 2 points on everybodies scorecards. Pascal landed one good shot for the whole fight, a left hook in one of the early rounds stunned Hopkins but otherwise Pascal was throwing wild shots and running for the whole fight. I knew he was ordinary after seeing him against Dawson but I thought that he maybe had to fight that negative tactical fight to steal the decision and it was a once off, he fought exactly the same against Hopkins but got beat up in return, Dawson didn't chase him too much but Hopkins shut off the ring and beat Pascal up for twelve rounds. Has there ever been a champ with worse accuracy than Pascal? He looked like an amateur. It's a shame, he seems a good athlete but he has no skill. What was your question dip****?
* - Who's not scoring it objectively? Me? Never. Look at what you just said. ** - Blind aswell as dumb. We had slow-motion replays proving it was legit.
Oh, so you don't know how to score a fight and you don't know what a knockdown is, I see. **** off :good
The sign of when you know you're wrong. Not being able to discuss the point, you, yourself brought up and ending with an 'insult'. :hi:
The first one was to the back of the head clearly.. The second one was clean, he may of slipped a little but he was hit with a legal punch to the chest shoulder area... And the ref did warn a lot about blows to the back of the head, and even holding and hitting.. He could have taken a point, but I don't have a problem with him not. Just the first KD shouldn't have been counted for sure..
what point did you bring up you muppet? All you said is that there was a replay. Yes and it wasn't a legit knockdown. What else do you want to talk about? You have nothing to say and you obviously don't know much about boxing, hence me telling you to **** off. You're a waste of time bud
First knockdown was to the ear, not back of heard. Second legit also. I agreed with Tarver's card, 112-114 Pascal.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYiMn9cURXU[/ame] Perfectly legit knockdown. See 1:07 -1:11 of video. Cuffed right on the ear. Nowhwere near the back of the head, despite Bernard's theatrics. A freeze-frame of the punch that knocked Bernard down: This content is protected And another, one twelfth of a second later: This content is protected If you still think the punch landed on the back of the head, see your eye-doctor !
Thanks for the video, it wasn't even a punch, it was more of a slap and a pull to the back of his head, no wonder it didn't hurt Hopkins. Even more bull**** than I thought it was at the time.
I think you need to see the optometrist, it clearly slips off Hopkins neck to the back of his head in a downwards slapping motion. Honestly it's right there, wtf is wrong with you
Are you blind or just mentally ******ed ? Here's a sport you might enjoy: This content is protected Because clearly, you know **** all about boxing !
This content is protected No matter what sport you try to follow, you should make an appointment with this woman first.
Wow, you proved me wrong. Not only that but you killed me with your wit and sense of humor Kill yourself :good
