The ridiculous cries of robbery

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jack, Dec 19, 2010.


  1. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    147
    Mar 7, 2010
    Oh Jack, Jack. Are you saying professional judges, paid to watch a fight and be objective, are incapable or otherwise should not be held accountable for failing to block out crowd applause!?

    What a high standard you hold them to!
     
  2. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    He was the betting favorite, meaning that he was favored to win the fight against Hopkins.

    Now at the time Hopkins fought Pavlik he was still considered the top middleweight in the world. Losing to Hopkins and then Martinez has taken alot of steam off from his mystique but make no mistake he was considered a dangerous fighter when he faced Bernard Hopkins.

    Like I said short memory, it wasn't long ago that Pavlik would have been favored over the top contenders at 160. Now that he's lost twice you're taking away from the win.
     
  3. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    biggest mistake Joe.C did was not fight Pavlik caz he would of schooled him and exposed him the same old man Hopkins did and then Joe would of had both names on his C.V. Hey Pavlik was a good powerfull middleweight but a simple move up to super middleweight changes evey thing.
     
  4. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    Ive just re watched the fight.

    No Robbery it could have been for either fighter. I was happy with the draw.

    Thought it was close. But without the 2 knockdowns B-Hop gets the win but the fact remains he did get the Knockdowns.