The Ring Editor: "We Have Informed Pacquiao He Must Defend Next Match Or Vacate"

I thought Pac already vacated?

 

if he loses he will defend, if he wins he will stay at welter.

 

It is all yapping until after Saturday. Ring is full of crap for even mentioning this before the fight. The writing is on the wall.

 

OK. Let's see. Pac beats Clotty. Shane beats Floyd. Shane has already said he would go all the way down to 140 to fight Pac...... :think Would Floyd?.....:think

 

****, that's kind of ridiculous. they were all well and dandy letting calzaghe defend smw and lhw. their policy is based on the principal that you can only lose the title in the ring. they've said someone will be pressured to defend but they don't strip champions. guess not...

 

Its just another alphabet title. Their bias to pac is unprecendeted as of late for some reason.

 

If he ever comes back to 140, a pac-bradley fight will be the best fight for him. (If pac-floyd/pac-shane doesn't materialize at the end of 2010)

 

"Some reason"? Like ODLH owns them?

 

The ring has really bullshitted their "title". their steadfast rules have always been up to interpretation at their whim.

they'll let some titilist fight bull **** fighters once year, and ignore another guy cleaning out the top ten in the same division.

The Ring is just as corrupts as any of them.


Keith

 

to be honest, i'm been reading ring for years. bought every issue i could before oscar owned it and i've never noticed any difference since he bought it

 

got to say this is double talk. from ring their policy says the fighter can only lose the title in the ring or by choosing to Vacate. it's been less then a year that pac has won the 140 lbs title thats a bit of BS from the Ring

 

see post inbetween

 

yeah, the policy has changed in this regard, well played. but otherwise, it hardly favours golden boy fighters

 

April 2010?

I want your time machine