The Ring: "Hatton's Record Simply Isn't Hall Of Fame Worthy"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by san rafael, Jun 22, 2009.


  1. safc1990

    safc1990 Goodbye Bolo :( Full Member

    4,999
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    Pretty much my views on it.
     
  2. crucialcookie

    crucialcookie Member Full Member

    436
    0
    Dec 1, 2008
    Im not a fan of hatton but i do think thats a bit harsh. If u read out his accomplishments and then look at his resume on paper. Id probably think ud have to go with him.
     
  3. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007
    On record alone he probably falls a baw hair short, but the thousands at the weigh ins etc. i reckon will push him over
     
  4. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    I really liked the guy, remember the Tszyu and Mayweather fights well, he was a good fighter. But he just seemed to lose something after the Tszyu fight, never the same fighter again. One great fight does not a HOF make, so i voted no
     
  5. David_TheMan

    David_TheMan ESB Sage Full Member

    5,908
    2
    Dec 31, 2007
    Hatton isn't good enough to be in the Hall of Fame, I hope he never enters it. He fought absolutely no one in his prime and when he did step up he was ktfo with authority. The same goes for Calzaghe, except all his notable wins were against faded HoF.
     
  6. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,864
    3
    May 30, 2007


    :goodgood post,i agree he should be inducted in the future
     
  7. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    981
    Dec 16, 2007
  8. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007

    You could say that about loads of HOF or future hofer

    De la Hoya - apart from Vargas what guys did he beat in their prime and he's a definite to get in.

    Even my beloved Pacman, :scaredas: most of his big wins were guys whos best days were behind them.

    Thats not cherry picking or calling them bad fighters that's just boxing.
     
  9. rooq

    rooq Rooq's Boxing Promoter Full Member

    12,353
    0
    Jan 16, 2007
    his record by itself won't make him hof worthy, but throw in the huge following (doesn't he hold the record for the biggest number of supporters following one man overseas or somethin?) and he should be considered a hof'er
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    hahhaha by my standards he doesn't get in and thats from before the Pac fight but I remember when Buffer said "With they places secured in the hall of fame" or something of the sort. Now that Pac knocks him out its like "Hatton sucks!"

    Can't say i'm surprised.
     
  11. Govanmauler

    Govanmauler Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,919
    10
    May 30, 2007

    ha ha ha you mean the ESB paradox ! :blood

    A fighter goes form world beater to bum in 0.5 seconds !
     
  12. fitzgeraldz

    fitzgeraldz And the new Full Member

    21,873
    3
    Feb 27, 2008
    I voted yes but actually no ... he has a bit of a ways to go ... he has to stay active, maybe win another championship or two and then ride off into the sunset. He better do it fast, that division is on the rise.
     
  13. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    I Agree with this post:good......Hatton was very good at his weight/reign for a very weak era.....Hatton to me is a sure hall of famer, and its not even close.....
     
  14. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    186
    May 16, 2009
  15. Mike_S

    Mike_S Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,033
    180
    Nov 4, 2007
    Had to think about it but yes, this is the hall of fame not top 100 or the like. Similar situation as naz. Borderline on record but one of the most popular and famous boxers in the world, big celebrities in the UK.