I'm the Mofo thats won over $20k the last 3 years betting boxing homey!! Yeah thats right from, from picking Margarito over Cotto, Pacquiao KO DLH to Mosley KO Margarito. Boxing is very easy to predict and not to hard to score. Plus im not in the minoirty at all. more then %75 of people thought Marquez won because he did. Like I said before, how the hell can people say Pacquiao won.....WHEN HE DIDNT THINK HE WON!!! You guys keeps watching replays but what you need to watch is going in the 12th with Roach saying "you need to put him down son" and Marquez corner saying "You got this fight in the bag"!! So going into the 12th Roach thought Pac was losing and Nacho thought Marquez was winning because he was!! The blind ****ing judges just robbed the man blind. so when you guys watch the replay listen for that and when the final bell rings watch Pacquiao put his head down and walk to his corner in defeat just like the 2nd fight. Man what a robbery, just devastating for boxing...
so we have to score fights now based on what their seconds say and not round by round? great advice man!
Nope you just need to know that even Pacquiaos own trainer thought he was losing and hes standing right there watching the whole damn fight. who gives a damn if you guys think he was winning, his own tranier knew he wasnt and wanted a KO
Full of crap uh?? so you really thought Pacquiao won uhh? based on what?? agressiveness without landing anything?? You guys are nuts. Pacquiao knew he didnt win but you guys think he did?? I dont have to sue the judges. alot more people agree with me...ALOT!! and now everybody knows hes gonna get destroyed by Mayweather if him and his daddy Arum grow some balls. When casual fans thouught you lost then you know you got a problem.
roach knows its a tight contest so he advised his son to get the KO to ensure a win. it's better advice than nacho saying that marquez was winning that led marquez the false impression that he is winning wide and fought passively the last few rounds.
you are exaggerating on this one. even the hardcore jmm fans acknowledges that pac landed on several occasions against marquez. if pacquiao was not landing, why did jmm had a redness on his face in the very first few rounds of the fight? pacquiao was actually slipping his left and moving to his right to avoid being tagged and landed some really nice right hooks that was stopping marquez on his tracks. and btw, which rounds have you scored for jmm clearly for this fight?
He didnt fight passively. I dont remeber the 10th round but I know he won the 11th round and I gave Marquez the 12th round too because Pacquiao didnt land ****. Marquez fought the same way the whole time. You guys need to watch the replay on mute because Lampley's dick riding of Pacquiao has got you guys scoring all ****ed up. The fight wasnt close at all. if you ask 10 people who won the fight I bet you 8-10 say he did, and thats all that matters. Yes Lara didnt get the win against Paul Williams but when the public knows you did then thats all that matters. pacquiao can keep that paper championship till he finally fights the best fighter of his Era and gets destroyed
Of course Pacquiao landed some shots and won a few rounds but he clearly got outboxed. I dont remeber what rounds I gave to Marquez. off the top of my head I thought the 1st round was close but I gave it to Pacquiao. I know after 4 rounds I had it 3-1 Marquez so he won 2,3,4. one of those rounds were close but I gave it to Marquez. I think the 5th round he really whooped some ass so I already had it 4-1 after 5. thats why I dont get how people can have Pac winning 7 rounds in this fight, you"ve got to be kidding me. even if I'm nice it could be 3-2 Marquez after 5 rounds but no way in hell it was 3-2 Pacquiao or 4-1 Pacquiao, no way!!!
Whats primetime?? I dont see anyway Pacquiao could've been winning 3-2 after 5. I mean what rounds are you giving him bro, he wasnt landing anything. a couple punches here and there but all the clean effective punching was done by Marquez.