The Ring Magazine: "Pacquiao won by One Point!"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by AxlRose, Nov 21, 2011.


  1. SirKillalot

    SirKillalot Boxing-FAN Full Member

    502
    0
    Nov 8, 2009
    Primetime is a channel. And it was very pro-Marquez. Even worse pro-Marquez than the biased HBO for Pacquiao.


    1,3,4,6 for Pacuiao
    2,5,7 for Marquez


    He landed a lot of punches, but because of him moving forward, it's a lot easier to see the clean punches from Marquez. It has to do with physics.
     
  2. dlts20

    dlts20 Active Member Full Member

    920
    0
    May 2, 2010
    1st off, Fischer is a known tool. 2nd, he's even a bigger Pac hugger then he is JMM
     
  3. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    7
    Jul 25, 2008
    Well its your score card but I dont see Pacquiao winning rounds 3,4. I forgot one of them was close, pssibly the 4th but Marquez got that 3rd round. but hey its your scorecard so im not gonna hate on you bro
     
  4. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    rounds 1-4 are close rounds so if you think the only way to score it is 3 rounds to 1 for marquez, you are mistaken. i have the first 4 rounds 3-1 for pacquiao which i gave round2 for marquez. i gave marquez rounds 6 to 8. he was basically fighting the same on the last few rounds but was more passive while pacquiao was more active. marquez best rounds where in the middle where at several occassion, he seems to be the initiator and the more agressive fighter.

    close rounds will give you different scores but saying that there is no way another judge or fan could see this fight scored is being close-minded. i can actually argue that i scored it to pacquiao 7-5 but i can see the other side of equation where people will give those close rounds to jmm.
     
  5. Dorfmeister

    Dorfmeister Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,558
    6
    Aug 8, 2007
    I trust in that YT guy "The Islander" and he says it was just about even so one point to either of them doesn't surprise me and down the toilet go the allegations of fraud.
     
  6. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    I was arsed to watch round one to four in slow mo, before I got too bored. As far as I could tell, both fought catiously and Pac sneaked in a jab, one-two or a left counter every here and there. Marquez landed very little remarkable in the opening rounds. He charged in with som heavy combos, but it seemed like they only connected on Pacs guard. Roach must have worked as hell on Pacs defence. I had it 3-1 after the first four, in Pacs favour.
     
  7. AndrewFFC

    AndrewFFC Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,501
    3
    Jun 12, 2009

    Amir Khan was co commentating ffs!
     
  8. bahobilat

    bahobilat Guest

    watch the fight again dummy. please let me know how many times pac was countered in rounds 9-12.

    yeah, in the middle rounds, jmm had pacs head bobbling beautifully, and won 3 out of 4 rounds. but in the last 4 rounds?

    :lol:
     
  9. bahobilat

    bahobilat Guest

    this.

    round 5-8, jmm won 3 out of 4.

    made it even after 8 rounds.

    round 9 is a toss up. but most awarded it to jmm. round 10-12 to pac.

    that is 7-5 score.
     
  10. anundecidedarm

    anundecidedarm Active Member Full Member

    812
    0
    Oct 23, 2011
    I think they scored pac marquez II in favor of marquez
     
  11. Diggersan

    Diggersan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,388
    2
    Mar 14, 2010
    its a mailbox, that was reader writing in, it wasn't the author.
     
  12. Diggersan

    Diggersan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,388
    2
    Mar 14, 2010
    +1 man, a lot of people had huge expectations going in and when it didn't happen they have to give pac crap. It's so ****ing bias its ridiculous. There are some idiots on here giving like 9 rounds to marquez.
     
  13. Diggersan

    Diggersan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,388
    2
    Mar 14, 2010
    fischer is not a pac nuthugger...only *****s say this because he doesn't buy into the crap that mayweather's selling and he knows he is a known ducker of opponents. Who the hell takes breaks in this business without a reason.
     
  14. kalunya5964

    kalunya5964 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,263
    0
    Sep 14, 2008
    Oh, you're too generous! One idiot said 10-2 Marquez but frankly, I couldn't find any single round for Pac and I am a proud *******!:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  15. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    You should keep watching until you have it 12 - 0 Marquez.