The Ring Magazine's Annual Ratings

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Big Ukrainian, Dec 8, 2008.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,882
    20,451
    Sep 15, 2009
    Good point.

    I did wonder about the date because the magazine seems about 6 week behind so the ratings for december would be released in feb but that magazine is titled march.
     
  2. TAC602

    TAC602 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,672
    6
    Oct 3, 2011
    Thanks for that info, Conteh.

    That actually makes things look even more accurate in several different scenarios - that had be scratching my head based on what happened in Jan/Feb in a couple of instances - than if the ratings had actually been put out in those months and not just the issue months.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,882
    20,451
    Sep 15, 2009
    He's right, for example I have the february issue here, I bought it january 11th or something and it is the first magazine with a write up of the pac-marquez fight
     
  4. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    11,990
    3,454
    Dec 18, 2004
    That's not to say The Ring didn't used to have annual ratings too, it did, but they were almost (if not exactly) identical to that month's ratings and split into tiers/groups, e.g.

    Take 1974.

    Middleweights would have Monzon world champ. Then rank:
    Group 1: Valdes, Licata, Antuirofermo
    Group 2: Tonna, Finnegan, Watts, Briscoe, etc.


    They used to have other awards, apart from the usual Fighter/Fight of the Year like Progress of the Year (winners inlcuded Alan Rudkin, Chris Finnegan).
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,882
    20,451
    Sep 15, 2009
    Very interesting. Thanks.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,882
    20,451
    Sep 15, 2009
    Any ideas here? If there's a way of doing it i'll gladly update them myself.

    I think the ring year end rankings are a great tool and whilst it isn't the be all and end all, it's certainly very very useful.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,882
    20,451
    Sep 15, 2009
    Not just hw, but every weight class btw; I have the year end rankings saved in my own database for every year but I don't know how to open up the boxrec page and input the data.
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    Have thought this for a while.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,882
    20,451
    Sep 15, 2009
    Even in one year we're talking 12 months for 17 divisions we're talking 204 top ten lists. Going back to atleast 1991 that's 4080 top ten lists. Plus the older divisions to boot.

    It's the sort of thing thu couldn't be scrabbled together by one man. It'd have to be a joint effort between a group of people who had the required magazines willing to split the workload.

    For now i'm content with having the annuals to hand with the possibility of anyone correcting any resume oversight due to the absence of those who slipped in and out of monthly ratings.
     
  10. Ncc84

    Ncc84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,709
    2
    Oct 14, 2009
    Do you have the annual rankings for 2009 and 2010? could you post the heavyweight ones if you do please?
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,882
    20,451
    Sep 15, 2009
    Heavyweight
    Champ - Wladimir Klitschko

    1. Vitali Klitschko
    2. Alexander Povetkin
    3. Eddie Chambers
    4. Ruslan Chagaev
    5. David Haye
    6. Chris Arreola
    7. Denis Boytsov
    8. Nikolai Valuev
    9. Alexander Dimitrenko
    10. Tony Thompson


    Champ - Wladimir Klitschko

    1. Vitali Klitschko
    2. David Haye
    3. Alexander Povetkin
    4. Tomasz Adamek
    5. Ruslan Chagaev
    6. Eddie Chambers
    7. Denis Boytsov
    8. Nikolai Valuev
    9. Alexander Dimitrenko
    10. Chris Arreola

    Year end for 2011 are on the rings website now and will be published in the next magazine.
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,882
    20,451
    Sep 15, 2009
    Ok I have every december ranking for every division aside from 97 but I will hopefully have aquired that over the next couple of weeks.

    Flea; how do you want this thread to work?

    Is it going to be just ad hoc now and cleaned up later; are you looking for a certain order to get things going; or has the novelty wore off already :lol:
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    This ain't my thread :lol:

    I think everyone should contribute whatever they can. I will have several word documents going as per division, so, for example Flywright: 1920; Jan, February blah blah blah

    I will update the threads as we go and fill in the gaps as oeoe contribute. Eventually I'll make one thread that will link to all the separate threads that will, in theory, be all the months and all the years.

    Just chuck everything you can into that thread and i'll start pasting it into the word documents and rearrange it chronologically :good
     
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,882
    20,451
    Sep 15, 2009
    :lol: oh dear I was wondering why there was no response on your thread :patsch

    Ok. At some point tomorrow i'll paste all my stored rankings. 99% of them are available on boxrec but i've plugged quite a lot of gaps.

    Infact it would be so much easier if I emailed you my spreadsheet because i'm terrible at formatting stuff in a suitable fashion.

    Maybe if I email it you and you can update your word docs and then you have it handy for when it comes to creating your super thread?
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    79,882
    20,451
    Sep 15, 2009
    Btw it's one huge spreadsheet so it'd be just one email.

    I've done that because it makes it very easy when searching opponents.