The Ring's new P4P list..

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ishy, May 4, 2010.


  1. Akxtinguish

    Akxtinguish Belt holder Full Member

    3,659
    1
    Dec 6, 2007
    You obviously can't be having Khan in there if Bradley and Alexander aren't ahead of him.

    Haye ahead of Vitali is also a bit unrealistic.

    Mosley is a bit generous. He just lost a lopsided UD.
     
  2. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    i suppose ur right, but there isnt any logic in my list.

    i also agree that putting khan ahead of alexander and bradley is questionable but its only a bit of fun so it doesnt really matter does it?! :yep

    why do you think haye should be behind vitali tho? he unified the CW division and now hes a HW champion.
     
  3. Smith

    Smith Monzon-like Full Member

    5,952
    2
    Mar 8, 2007
    **** all this generic ''you have to have this guy in because of what he did years ago'' ****.

    This is who I consider the best ten in the world right now, given all where to face off against each other.

    If I havent seen it in your last fight(s) your out.

    1.Floyd Mayweather
    2.Manny Pacquiao
    3.Wladimir Klitschko
    4.Sergio Martinez
    5.Paul Williams
    6.Timothy Bradley
    7.Chad Dawson
    8.David Haye
    9.Yuiriorkis Gamboa
    10.Juan Manuel Lopez
     
  4. Akxtinguish

    Akxtinguish Belt holder Full Member

    3,659
    1
    Dec 6, 2007
    The funny thing is that even though you just made your list for a laugh, it's better than some of the ones you'll see in the general forum.

    As for Haye being behind Vitali, you have to keep in mind that the lists are based on recent activity, as opposed to all-time lists which take a whole career into account.

    Best list i've seen in a while, but I reckon you could replace JuanMa with Dirrell (not that I like the guy). But in any case, number 10 is pretty much an open spot.

    Top list :good
     
  5. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    it is a good list and i was thinking whether to put gamboa in there myself.
     
  6. Mordechai

    Mordechai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,269
    1,308
    Jun 18, 2008
    1 Floyd
    2 Pac



    3 Wladimir klitschko
    4 Marquez
    5 dawson
    6 williams
    7 martinez
    8 vitali klitschko
    9 adamek
    10 bradley
     
  7. mbrockett

    mbrockett ESB voyeur Full Member

    888
    0
    Jun 28, 2008
    problem with having vlad in is then it would have to be judged on achievement rather than skills. he is the very definition of a fighter exploiting his size. if most other fighters were his size he would lose. but this argument is well trodden...
     
  8. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    My 2 cents...

    1. Manny Pacquiao
    2. Floyd Mayweather
    3. Juan Manuel Marquez
    4. Paul Williams
    5. Chad Dawson
    6. Wladimir Klitschko
    7. Sergio Martinez
    8. Shane Mosley
    9. Juan Manuel Lopez
    10. Fernando Montiel
     
  9. MattMattMatt

    MattMattMatt Guest

    To the guy who mentioned Bute if it was in response to me. I never said he was top 10 P4P, I merely stated that the he arguably has a better resume than Wonjongkam. Neither of them are top 10 right now in my opinion. If the ring based theirs on talent or potential rather than results, then perhaps Lopez, Gamboa or even Rigondeaux could be argued to be ahead in those stakes.

    Regarding the Vitali / Haye comment. I don't think Haye has to be ranked ahead of Vitali at HW to be ahead of him in a P4P ranking since Vit is about 30lbs heavier and 4 1/2 inches taller, I don't think it matters if they are in the same weight divisions, the whole meaning of pound for pound shouldn't suddenly go out the window because the weight classes stop at HW.
     
  10. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    I've noticed they always pick or elevate, slightly obscure, niche fighters like Caballero, Pong etc. As if it lends the list more credibility.
     
  11. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    No offence but I think that is a gash argument. Wlad is big so naturally uses his physical advantages. He'd be stupid not to. You could say Floyd and Manny have fast hands - without them they'd be ****. The Klits use the tools/physical advantages they have to be the best they can be. Every fighter should do that. Tyson's style only worked because of his size. I could argue if the Klits were 5ft10 they'd be bobbing and weaving, throwing power shots and destroying all opponents like a prime Tyson. Works both ways.

    You have people like Valuev, Julius Long, Zuri Lawrence who are as big/bigger than the Klits yet they're nowhere near as good.
     
  12. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
  13. Guy

    Guy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,597
    0
    Dec 15, 2008
    Why's Mosley still 5?
     
  14. Akxtinguish

    Akxtinguish Belt holder Full Member

    3,659
    1
    Dec 6, 2007
    It's not only size with Wladimir. He's got the best jab of any fighter at the moment, regardless what weight they fight at (in other words, "P4P" best jab).

    They're different sizes, but Haye simply hasn't looked impressive at heavyweight (although it's impressive that he made the climb and held his ground), while Vitali has been harpooning guys like Arreola who were considered genuine threats.
     
  15. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007