Rigo was lucky there was a lot of distractions in Donaire's camp and his shoulder was injured for months why would the Ring put Rigo in its top 10 P4P? :hi::hi::hi:
Yeah it is subjective, I also take into account that he is the real champ and I don't feel like p4p is so strong that Rigo should be 10 or so. If Trout looks great against Canelo than I could argue he deserves to be higher than Rigo but i just can't fight 7 fighters who are more impressive than Rigo.
He's a welter he was cutting muscle, I think you will be surprised, hopefully he can get Berto, Kell, Paulie, Thurman and Ruslan cause he beats them all.
if Devon can prove it, then yeah put him at 11, but until otherwise, you'd have to rank Froch over him at least. You can even put Guerrero ahead of him
Not sure how anyone could place Canelo or Trout in the top 10 when one of them wins. Either way.... whether its Trout or Canelo, no chance they should be in the top 10. The winner should be 13-15 (just imo) Though Im sure GBP will put the winner in the top 10.
You know what you might be right about Froch, Alexander beats Guerrero, that would actually be a good fight if Guerrero looks good against Floyd and doesn't do much time. I think people give him to much **** for Bradley and Matthysse, the guy is ranked behind Paulie though and he would shut out Paulie.
The winner will be the king of 154, Trout deserves a spot more than Canelo but Canelo being at 15 if he does what I think he will is laughable, if Canelo beats Trout, Smith and Lara where would you have him?
In what world does this make sense? atsch If Trout beats Canelo, he'll ALREADY have gotten a better win from his fight vs. Cotto. So how would beating someone LESSER in canelo (as compared to his win over Cotto), move him ahead of Rigo, who has a better win over another P4P ranked guy in Doanire? You really are inconsistent... :roll:
God are a lying racist ****** **** your hate I said you could argue but I put Rigo above the winner you can't stop lying can you just kill a black and get it over with.
Lying about what? atsch For ****'s sake man....get a ****in grip. Just explain how Trout should pass Rigo when he won't even have a win that matches what Rigo has already done. Especially when it would not even be trout's best win? Can you do that w/o throwing a ****in hissy fit and cry racism where it doesn't even exist?
Who would Canelo possibly be ranked ahead of if he beats up Trout though? That would stand alone as his first signature win, and unlike Rigo/Donaire who was an elite fighter and a top 5 p4p himself, it would come against Trout, a solid but none elite (imo) fighter. It would def bump him up a great deal, but I think being 13 or so should Canelo defeat Trout impressively (which he should) is fair. May Ward JMM Martinez Rigo Wlad Mares Pac Bradley Froch Donaire are 11 guys right off the bat that there would be no way I could rank Canelo over. That's off the top of my head without getting too in depth with it. Then guys like Broner, Ghost, ect will come in and that's who Canelo would be competing with for 12th, 13th, 14th, ect.... and I could see a 12th or 13th ranking for him sure. But top 10? Kicking two of the names up there off the list? No way.... Now, should he beat Trout, then beats Lara and Smith, with the way p4p lists work with others losing as hes winning I can see him breaking the top 10, Lara is a good talent and he would have then knocked off two of his peers at the weight. I wouldn't have a problem with him breaking the top 10 if he beat Lara and Smith after Trout and did it impressively.
atsch Did you already forget hwat you just posted? You said if Trout wins, you could see him being placed over Rigo. How can you even justify placing trout over Rigo if he beats canelo? Do you even get it? And WHAT was I lying about anyway? Can you even answer that?