The Ring's New Top Ten P4P is S***!!!

I dont know why people still get suprised? Ring lost its cred years ago

 

Floyd is not number 1.

 

I'm more baffled by the presence of Guerrero and Broner, then lack of Rigo. But really Rigo should be at least 6

 

Froch is above Guerro, Bradley & Broner. /thread closed

 

Rigondeaux's win over Donaire wasn't that great!!! Donaire is a cuounter puncher only way to beat someone like Rigo is by fighting on the front foot and putting constant pressure on him, Donaire's style was a perfect match with Rigo's style it was just like Floyd vs JMM that was easy work for Floyd becuase JMM is a counter puncher!

 

When you see Guerrero's name thats all you need to know really. And in years from now, the people who like Floyd will use that as a good Win discussing Floyds resume, he beat a top 10 p4p fighter bla bla

 

I guess this marks the end of the ring p4p list being used as a credible source. Absolutely baffling.

 

I don't have him that high as well, 6,7 or 8 ish

 

Goldenboy Promotions have The Ring as his hostage.

 

So which "win" do you give him credit for?

 

the bradley fight, but he was expected to win that. He was expected to win both marquez fights and he got schooled by him :!:

 

So your not giving him credit for the third Marquez fight and you don't get credit for the Bradley fight as he was expected to win even if it is over a guy who was ranked in the top 10 P4P by most people:huh.

With that logic I think I should take Floyd out of the top 10 entirely.

 

I give credit to Pac for the Bradley win but going 1-2 in your last 3 and getting knocked into next week isn't top 4 P4P worthy ya kook :nut

 

Yet you have Floyd at #1

Was it his victory over Cotto that put him there. If so where is Trout on your list he did just as good a job.

Or was it the Ortiz fight. Cant see Maidana or Lopez on your list either.