The Ring's New Top Ten P4P is S***!!!

Floyd moved up in weight to fight Cotto. Trout has fight at middleweight before

 

So Trout doesn't get as much credit for beating Cotto because he had some fights at middleweight and Pac doesn't get any credit for beating Bradley as he was expected to win:huh

This **** is complex no wonder The Ring is having a hard time putting a decent top 10 together.

 

Trout gets plenty of credit, but not as much as the blown up light welterweight who already had beaten Cotto the fight before.

And Pacquiao gets credit for Bradley, but he lost the fights before and after that one.

 

IF JMM Vs. Bradley is next what will the "win" do for the guy who comes out on top P4P wise?

Marquez to #2, Bradley to top #3?

 

That's golden boy for ya I guess.

 

Hes the consensus #1, meanwhile youre the ONLY ONE who has Manny top 4

And you want to make fun of other lists. atsch

 

Calling Floyd a blown up light welterweight is a bit generous he hasn't made 140 since 2005/06? Its not like he's Josesito Lopez coming up to 147 and beating Ortiz.

 

In all seriousness. Do I believe that Floyd is the most talented boxer in the world. Absolutely.

But at some point you have to prove it and he just hasn't done it over the last few years.

 

That phrase is used for Floyd's opponents, so why can't I use it for Floyd.

Floyd fought a 34 year old, part time boxer/promoter in Oscar. Well Floyd is a 36yr old parttime boxer/promoter

 

:deal

Difference for me tho is Mayweather's work ethic in the gym >De La Hoya's

 

LOL No.5 and 8

 

****ing awful list. I'd have:

1. Mayweather
2. Marquez
3. Ward
4. Martinez
5. Rigondeaux
6. Wlad
7. Pacquiao
8. Bradley
9. Donaire
10. Froch

 

Ok then have him at #2, that has nothing to do with your ridiculous and obvious biased ranking of Manny.

 

and Oscar was a much bigger part in his promotional venture as well.