The Ring's New Top Ten P4P is S***!!!

It's a terrible list. Giampa ****ed it all up at some point and I stopped looking at it, but I checked it out to see where they have Rigo and noticed they still have Donaire there at 10 and ****ing Broner at 5, with no sign of Rigo. It's just unbelievably terrible.

 

The list isn't good. sure it's updated?

Their listing of broner in the top 10 tells you all you need to know about ring magazine at the moment

 

terrible list especially with Guerrero magically moving up

 

Compare the resumes of Rigo and Donaire. The achievements over the past 3 years. Donaire outranks Rigo even after a loss. there's no lineage in p4p rankings. just because you beat someone doesn't require you to be ranked higher

 

Three questions come to mind. Why is Broner so high up there? Where is Rigondeaux? And who is Guerrero?

 

Lol.

Broner #5 and Rigo not on it.


atsch


Who the **** comes up with those lists?

 

Klitschko's been the champ for years, dominating opponents and he should be ranked behind a guy with 12 fights and one big win over Nonito Donaire ? I know this is a pound for pound list, but Klitschko is a future ATG who's shown more dominance towards his fellow HW than most boxers on these lists except Floyd. I'm not a big fan of his style, but I'd put him at #2.

 

My list:

1. Mayweather
2. Ward
3. Marquez
4. W. Klitschko
5. Martinez
6. Pacquiao
7. Rigondeaux
8. Donaire
9. Bradley
10. Froch

 

I just dont see Pac that high on the list, he lost 2 of his last 3 fights and one via KO. 9 or 10 would be more appropriate rating for him.

 

yes but the only fighter he has struggled with in the last 16 fights in JMM.

And he always will.

He's dominated everyone else he's fought and will continue to do so IMO if he keeps taking the sport seriously.

 

1. Mayweather
2. Ward
3. Marquez
4. Martinez
5. Wlad
6. Mares
7. Rigo
8. Froch
9. Donaire
10. Bradley


A rushed list that could be debated although I'd argue strongly mine is still better than The Rings, can't have Pac on it hes lost 2/3, pretty sure i saw someone have Danny Garcia on their list atsch

 

If Arenas clowns and dominates LeBron in a one on one game without any trouble then is he a better player than LeBron, one on one? Because that's the equivalent here dip****. To not have Rigo in the top 10 p4p is criminal/laughable.

 

Come on now, DeMarco is a far better fighter than Donaire with a far superior resume. PDL is an all time great so arguably losing to him shouldn't affect your p4p ranking. Don't get me started on the greatness of Gavin Rees.

 

red means bull****!!!!!!!!!!

* broner is a very good fighter, but is he higher than a man who was king in boxing not so long ago, absolutly not atsch broner is between 8-15, 5 atsch

* klitschko is not p4p worthy, he is so boring, the heqavyweight class is so bad, somebody like canelo in a p4p sense, standing 6'6 would destroy him, klitschko are so overrated because heavyweights nowadays are just all bad

* guerrero, good solid fight, but sorry, does not belong in a p4p top 10 list, does not have the skills, beat no big names opponents, instead of him you could put in canelo, roman gonzales or danny garcia, they more skilled and just better

* donaire in, guillermo not in atsch:!::****off:beat

ring suck

 

Correct this please - Klitschko has shown much more dominance in his own division than Mayweather has - you say except Mayweather? Are you kidding - I'm not here to diss Mayweather but Klitschko has shown far more dominance at HW than Mayweather at WW - hell, Mayweather hasn't fought most of the best WW over the past 8 years!!!

Come on, stop the nuthugging and show objectivity

And yes, Klitschko should be in the top 6 for sure!