The rings p4p list?

http://www.thering-online.com/ringpages/ratings2.html

 

My guess would be Hopkins 4 or 5 and Pavlik dropped like a bad habit.

 

Hopkins' win over Pavlik was much more impressive than Marquez' win over Casamayor and against a better opponent

 

how???... JMM moved up a weight classed and TKO'd the reigning Linear Champion who's defeated plenty of great fighters

all Bernard did was expose a hype train....though it was a great performance, Casamayor is a PROVEN champion, he's beaten, Corrales, Campbell, Freitas, fighters like that....he's a true great fighter

Pavlik was a fighter people "thought" was great (or hoping)....but in reallity was just a "good" fighter, not to mention the fight was at a catchweight

JMM clearly had the better win, be real...

 

was Casamayor in anybodys p4p top ten or fifteen.

 

he was only they're over beating ONE fighter......

 

BHop moves up no 4 spot imo :good

 

He was there before the fight. Hopkins moved nowhere.

 

I guess Pavlik was highly regarded. :rofl :rofl :rofl

 

you be real man. Casamayor was shot to **** and in his previous 2 fights got beat by Santa-Cruz and almost lost to Katsidis. Pavlik was coming off 2 straight wins over Jermain Taylor and 17 years younger than Hopkins.

 

if that's the case he should get no lower than no. 4

 

that list is dumb



calslappy should be 2 hopkins should be 3 marquez should be 4 izzy stays as is ivan calderon should be 8 cotto should be 10 mijares should be 6 raffy should be 7 and margarito should be 9

 

I don't understand Ivan Calderon and Christian Mjares on the list