The rise of a legend

What else can you do on an empty brain?

 

I see your friends still giving you their support. You sure need it!

Okay remind me again. How long was it before Roger and Hector lost their first fights??

Let's see Roger had his first in 84. his second in 85. His third in 86, all by knockout. After that I lost count of the losses. All the while hector is still going strong and adding more championships for ten straight years.

Now could you plese remind why Roger was considered "hot" or to put it another way, "more proven" than Camacho if he's getting flattened every other fight?

 

Why consider him a hot fighter if you know he's not tested. Or is that just the hype you bought into?

 

Really? care to mention the many people who said it? it doesnt look as though you have any proof it. Got proof? Didnt think so.

 

what are you trying to say John? That Roger was past his prime by his third year at pro or that you were so boneheaded that you judged his greatness prematurely?

You're as arrogant as you are stupid

 

because "we count Rosario beating Hector"

Okay, sure! :good

Since that's the case, Hagler has 13 successful title defenses and left the sport with a record of 63-2-2, no losses since 1976, and is the only fighter to have whipped both leonard and Hearns

 

In case we dont i'll help out; Bramble, lightweight champ June 84-OCt. 86
lost to the man Hector beat. In other words he couldnt beat hector in 12 rounds but took less than two rounds to beat Bramble.

In the same time frame Bramble held his one title, Hector held two titles without losing either one (like Bramble)

You know you make my man look better all the time!

 

That's what I said ******! Where is it?

 

How cute. Is that you before reaching puberty?

 

Please stop airing your personal fantasies here. This is a family forum