Marciano never had 15.5" biceps .That is the measurement of George Foreman v Ken Norton. https://www.reddit.com/r/Boxing/comments/4j7sjt/tale_of_the_tape_measurements_ken_norton_vs/ This content is protected This content is protected
That's definitely bull****, Foreman's arms were way bigger than 15.5 Then again, just looking at marciano's arms, you can tell they're bigger than 14 inches. I remember one TOTT listed Sonny liston's fist as 16 inches, which is ****ing ridiculous and contradicts the 14 inch measurement he got for the Patterson fight. TOTT is honestly pretty unreliable It could also be that Marciano didn't flex his arm for the measurements
Marciano also had a rather puny,[ for a heavyweight chest measurement of 39",] absolutely none of which makes any difference to the result of this fight.
Walcott's was only 40" iirc Dempsey's is a staggering 41" for the string bean he was (no offense meant, he was starving for most of his life)
Rock was all legs....but anyway muscle measurements don’t equate to anything W/L wise. Unless someone can bring up a stat of bicep size to w/L ratio?