The series of fights between Pacquiao and Marquez does not hurt Pacquiao's legacy

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jack, Nov 19, 2011.


  1. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    Yeah, I agree. I thought it'd be a very close fight and bet on Pacquiao to win on points. I remember making a thread explaining that Marquez being a lightweight and Pacquiao a welter would not be a factor in the fight as they're basically the same size. I can't believe so many people wrote Marquez off because he was supposed to be smaller. He was always going to give Pacquiao problems.
     
  2. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    I'll agree there, it's what Roy Jones Junior and (Currently) Floyd lack(ed)
     
  3. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    I think you're probably right. Duran wasn't hurt by the losses to Leonard, Greb wasn't hurt by the losses to Tunney and so on.
     
  4. kopejh

    kopejh Guest

    Duran wasn't hurt by the losses to Leonard because he'd already beaten him in the greatest fight ever and it was plainly obvious that he didn't give a **** about the last two fights.

    it's also stupid as hell to compare Marquez to Leonard who has a case for being the best WW ever.
     
  5. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    just like ali frazier?

    ang a pac-jmm fight will still result to the same outcome, be it in strawweight or mega super heavy weight snv style.
     
  6. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    I'm not comparing the fighters, I'm comparing the fights and the aftermath of them. Pacquiao isn't as good as Pep, Marquez isn't as good as Saddler and neither are as good as Duran or Leonard. That clearly isn't the point I'm making.
     
  7. PaoloMirani

    PaoloMirani Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,317
    1
    Oct 31, 2010
    If anything it enhances it imo, Pac's obviously dynamic enough to overcome a stylistic disadvantage. Pac's the epitome of a "fighter", if u came to fight ala margarito, Hatton...he will obliterate u. Against "matadors", he doesnt look as spectacular but somehow someway he's still able to press the action. To me THAT takes more skill...to mark up a backpedaling opponent in a defensive posture...ready to counter when your at your most exposed.

    So I dont see how eeking out a close win against a counterpunching specialist in any way takes away from Pac's legacy.....It takes alotta guts and more important;y---skill to beat JMM the way Pac beat him. Closing the distance requires more adept timing than just someone simply backpedaling and maintaining distance.Pac played to JMM's strength and STILL beat him.