The Six Reasons Why I Dislike Heavyweight Boxing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, Jul 28, 2010.


  1. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,755
    14,659
    Mar 26, 2009
    I seriously believe that if the Klitschko's were from america and black american,

    that they would both be worshiped on this forum.

    The HATE comes from them being white, and non american speaking eastern europeans is the problem.

    There are alot of nationistic americans here looking to live a success through the HW division rather than their own lives, and that is sad and I feel sorry for them when they make these stupid racist posts.

    The HW division clearly points to one hero.
     
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    Yeah, the whole thread is really about the Klitschko brothers. The parts where I criticize heavyweight history and the division as a whole and David Haye's choice of next opponent were just padding, really I'm sitting here in Dumbsville Tennessee with my Uncle Sam outfit on, crying like Oliver McCall. :|

    General Forum imbecile.
     
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    Except I'm Scottish, white as snow, and have no connection in any way with anything American.

    You sir, are a moron.
     
  4. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,755
    14,659
    Mar 26, 2009
    Does anyone have any answer to this?
     
  5. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,755
    14,659
    Mar 26, 2009
    Can you not admit that the Klitschko's are by far the best HW's in the world right now?
     
  6. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,693
    29,293
    Jul 26, 2004
    Interesint read :good I disagree slightly about the depth of the heavy division..... i think it has some depth to it... but its that nobody really fights eachother

    Wlad
    Vitali
    Haye
    Adamek
    Chagaev
    Chambers
    Povetkin
    Arreola
    Boytsov
    Solis


    i mean, yes.... one can nitpick but is this really the worst division in boxing in terms of depth? personally, i dont think it is.... (and that was without adding guys like valuev and peter in there) what makes this division SUCK and is an embarresment, is that hardly anyone fights one another and everyone is afraid of the champion to the point where they wont even challenge him. But realistically, i dont really think its all that shallow compared to some of the other shallow classes.
     
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    Admit it? :huh Why would I need to admit it?? They are by far the best heavyweights in the world right now, by a long way. Who has ever said they weren't?? Also, what relevance does this have to this thread anyway? :think
     
  8. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    58,589
    13,740
    Jul 28, 2009
    Stop being racist and nationalistic, Popkins. :patsch:lol::lol::lol:


    ...But, seriously, where the **** do these people come from? :-(
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol: You need to see them to believe them!
     
  10. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    296
    Jul 23, 2008
    man you showing the same homo love you show to Calzaghe but now to Wlad.

    I agree Wlad would probably beat Joe Frazier, but who has Wlad faced that had quicker speed (hand and foot) than Muhammad Ali?

    Wladimir best wins Byrd, Peter, Chageav aint on the level of opposition beaten by Ali, Holyfield and Lennox.

    The current HW division is weaker than it used to be. So being in the top 10 ring ranking in this era dont mean it is better than being in the top 10 ring rankings in the previous eras.

    Current (ESB)

    Heavyweight

    ESB Champ: Wladimir Klitschko (Beat Ruslan Chagaev June 2009)

    1. Vitali Klitschko
    2. David Haye
    3. Alexander Povetkin
    4. Ruslan Chagaev
    5. Tomasz Adamek
    6. Eddie Chambers
    7. Nikolay Valuev
    8. Sam Peter
    9. Tony Thompson
    10. Olandier Solis

    Olandier Solis is in the top 10 with 16 fights. Now compare this to 1986

    This content is protected
    , Champion
    1. This content is protected
    2. This content is protected
    3. This content is protected
    4. This content is protected
    5. This content is protected
    6. This content is protected
    7. This content is protected
    8. This content is protected
    9. This content is protected
    10. This content is protected
    1973

    This content is protected
    , Champion
    1. This content is protected
    2. This content is protected
    3. This content is protected
    4. This content is protected
    5. This content is protected
    6. This content is protected
    7. This content is protected
    8. This content is protected
    9. This content is protected
    10. This content is protected
    point being Wladimir beating the ring #3 today aint as impressive say the ring # 3 in 1986 (Pinklon Thomas) or ring #3 Ken Norton.

    Not that it is Wladimir's fault the HW division is so ****, but that is why the HW division is disliked since it dont contain the quality it once had.
     
  11. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    - The moment the thread pasted, was a ****wit.

    [/quote]
    Ali did not have anywhere near the same physical advantages in the majority of his fights that Lewis, Wladimir and Vitali had. It was a more level playing field back then, for 100% certainty.

    Claim: Validated [/quote]

    I'm just going to invalidate one of your claims, because it's obvious that the rest of your claims are entirely stupid.

    Someone seems to forget the dominant HW before Ali was a 5'8, 190lb fighter and that the average height of Ali opponents was 5'10 - 6 inches shorter than Ali.

    Wlad in his last ten fights has an average fighter size of 6'2, a height advantage of 4 inches. The last "dominant" fighter in his division was either his brother or Lennox Lewis - both approximately the same size as him.

    The rest of your post? It's just stupid. Other people have pointed it out but honestly, don't review boxing, you don't understand it well enough and you make baseless idiotic claims.
     
  12. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,693
    29,293
    Jul 26, 2004

    The top 7 guys at heavy right now are

    Wlad
    1 - Vitali
    2 - Haye
    3 - Povetkin
    4 - Adamek
    5 - Chagaev
    6 - Chambers
    7 - Boytsov

    thats an official list of 8 top heavyweight fighters in order....

    that is by no means a **** list.... just because it doesnt stack up to some of that All time great eras throughout all of boxing history doesnt mean its weak eather. i think thats a pretty decent line up of solid fighters.
     
  13. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,241
    5,919
    Apr 30, 2006
    That's exactly the same way I see it. :thumbsup

    It's tough for the division to look good if nobody fights each other to show it. When they do, the results have been pretty encouraging- Adamek-Arreola was a really entertaining fight, for example. The contenders need to quit waiting around like vultures for the Klitschko's to fall off before they make their move, taking the easiest fights possible in the meantime. Get some good fights made, and the whole division looks better.
     
  14. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010

    Can you summerise this into one liners.
     
  15. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    Let's see, the greatest fighters of this era and I give them respect, Fancy that? That Calzaghe and Wladimir get credit from me rather than the idiots you like.


    Short sighted post, why?

    Your problem is that an olympic gold medalist who just turned 30, who has been facing fringe contender fights from almost Day 1, has managed to crack the Top 10, despite facing several ex title contenders and dominating them.

    Yet, Ali himself got himself into the Top 10 within less fights. He fought a legend in Archie Moore in his 15th fight and had a title fight in his 20th
    fight (when there was only one title belt)

    Michael Spinks is another fighter who had a title in his 17th fight.

    So your point is made completely invalid by the history you think will protect you.

    The same Pinklon Thomas that spent most of his career as a contender retiring on his stool? Who got a title at a very weak time in boxing and then got absolutely beaten senseless against anyone with a pulse afterwards? Tommy Morrison for instance?

    Even ESB who have different rankings to most and tend not to favour fighters that lose to someone named Klitschko has 4 fighters in the current top ten that Wlad has beaten.

    The difference between this era and Ali's era? Ali when he had fighters his size, was always in battles because the guy refused to believe he could lose, fought with everything he had and had an iron jaw (something he's now punished for, via parkinsons)

    You'll not see those wars anymore, except if someone can challenge Vitali. Wlad? Doesn't have the chin and is too dominant to be involved in that type of war.