The small slick lightheavy wanabe heavyweight vs the superheavyweight jab

I've never believed a 6'5 240 pound heavyweight automatically deals with cagey slick 175-180 pounder any better than he deals with bigger guys. It's all a matter of ability.

If it's consensus around here I certainly dont follow it.

I've read posts on here that go something like, "Joe Louis struggled with 170 pound Billy Conn - imagine what Lennox Lewis would have done to Conn ! He would have blown him out of the ring !" ..... but I dont see anything on Lewis's record to back that up much at all. In fact, just as Marciano might lack many quality big (reasonably tall and heavy) heavyweights on his resume, the jury is still out on how Lennox would cope with quality smaller fighters. I suspect an Ezzard Charles, Archie Moore or Tommy Gibbons would do better against Lewis than Golota, Grant or Ruddock did.

 

Impeltiere and Campolio were horrible. Valdes, Baker and Henry weren't superheavyweights, just normal heavyweights. The amount of superheavyweights with good skill and athletic ability to go with it is countable on one hand.

 

Lewis would easily defeat Chalres, Moore, or Gibbons. Lennox could end it early or late. I think Charles and Morre would be early fights because they liked exchanges. Conn would not have much of a chance, but he could run a while. Lewis used to say, so and so has never faced a fighter like me. And he's right. Who else was tha skilled, that big, and hit that hard?

Lewis isn't likely to be outboxed. When you've got a very good boxer who has many inches in height and reach, and huge edge in power, the much smaller boxer type is pretty much out of business.

 

And where exactly did Lewis prove this ability against smaller pesty fighters ?
I'm not saying any of the mentioned beat him, but it's an unanswered question how he'd deal with quality small, cagey fighters.
A smaller fighter is harder to hit, quicker, and conscientously aware of the bigger man. All the men I mentioned had plenty of skill and were adaptable. It's not inconceivable that they could give Lewis many problems he didn't encounter against the likes of Grant, Golota etc.

 

There is certainly a point of diminishing returns for size around 190. Height is a bit more of an advantage and only begins to diminish around 6'4"

 

Simply, you have seen it dilute throughout history as the weights and regulations have stopped the smaller man gaining the experience necessary to overcome the bigger men.

 

Buddy Baer was as large as Lennox Lewis was at his heaviest most of his career.

 

Lewis breezed through smaller / annoying fighters in the amateurs. In the Pro's Lewis defeated a tricky Ossie Ocasio long before he was viewed as the heir apparent of the heavyweight division. Those are the examples I would use.

A fighter like Charles is giving up about 5” in height, and 11” in reach in a fantasy match up vs Lennox Lewis. This not a slight disadvantage, it is a major disadvantage. Smaller fighters really cannot win by out fighting taller and longer fighters with near equal to or greater skills when the numbers get this out of whack.

They ( smaller fighters ) have to navigate thought no man’s land, risk getting nailed, deliver, then get out of dodge before being hit. This takes a lot of energy. They also must be able to get the larger fighter’s respect with power.

 

Lennox's holding and pushing of the neck down would make Ali's look tame in comparison, the dirty *******.

 

Ali held for defense and breathers. Lewis held to deliver punches, and push down on his opponents.

 

Y

Ali also held to tire opponents while resting himself.

Frazier II? Foreman?

His biggest fights basically.

Anyway, 240-250 pound 6'6 man leaning on the back of your damned neck = straight ****ing bull****.