The Super 6; Americans making a good account of themselves

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigReg, Mar 28, 2010.


  1. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    You see what I'm talking about? It's like I'm dealing with a bunch of women on here many times. I'm spineless, but you're the one talking **** behind a computer. Hilarious.
     
  2. horst

    horst Guest


    :lol: Who do you think you are kidding? :patsch

    It's the same tired old routine from you every ****ing day on here, you say something, and then when you're called on it, you hide behind some flimsy pretence like you were only quoting someone else, or you were playing devil's advocate, or some other infantile **** like that.

    Man up, you slimy snake *******, man up and start owning your opinions and not denying and hiding and lying every other day.
     
  3. horst

    horst Guest

    I'm not spineless, because I say what I think and I defend my own position when questioned. You never do. Your tired old act fools no-one mate, you're a hater who doesn't even have the courage to admit it. *****.
     
  4. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Why don't you stop acting like a teenage girl and actually talk boxing? Everyone knows Pacquiao's offense wasn't all that effective against Clottey. He had a lot of trouble landing and many people blamed it on Clottey's turtle shell defense. Abraham employs a similar defense. He's never been so much as cut in a fight. He was cut up and his face was swollen against Dirrell. Dirrell did a better job than Pacquiao in penetrating that turtle shell defense. I don't see why that pisses you off so much. If you want to talk boxing, that's fine. If you just want to throw around insults and try to drag me into a bitching fest, I don't have time for that.
     
  5. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    My opinions are boxing related, and I will defend them accordingly. I'm not going to feed into your paranoia where you feel everything is a personal attack on your idol. I'm here starting a thread about the Super Six, and all you can do is ***** and moan about Pacquiao.
     
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    OK, *****, we will just continue on same as always, after you make what you think is a cleverly concealed criticism of Pacquiao but which anyone with a brain can read exactly for what it is, then deny it all. Yawn.

    As I've already said, your comparison was **** to begin with.

    Abraham employs a similar defensive stance to Clottey, but the way he uses it and the way he fights is totally different.

    Paul Williams creamed Winky Wright, and Winky is better at using the shell than either Abraham or Clottey. Does that mean Williams's win was better than Dirrell's or Pacquiao's, or that he performed better on the night, or that he is a better fighter than Dirrell or Pac? No, it doesn't mean any of this, because Abraham, Clottey and Winky are three completely different fighters and the three wins in question were three completely different fights with different circumstances.

    Clottey's main objective was to get through the fight unscathed.
    Abraham's main objective was to knock Dirrell out.

    Is it therefore really that surprising that Clottey took far less clean punches than Abraham?? :patsch

    I'm sure statisticians could confirm that Clottey had his guard up far more often and for longer than Abraham did. I'm sure they could also confirm that Clottey threw less punches and was on the back foot far, far more.

    Thus, it is totally obvious that Abraham was easier to hit than Clottey was, so obvious in fact that it renders your 'comparison' tenuous and, ultimately, pointless.
     
  7. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol: Why did YOU bring him up then, and in a critical fashion, in your thread about the Super Six???

    Because you're a hate-filled slut, that's why. :good

    Your comparison was **** and pointless, it was just yet another example of you making a thinly veiled dig at a guy you hate.

    Next time you make a thread about the Super Six, fancy leaving your irrelevant dislikes out of it and perhaps just keep it to... the Super Six? Nah, course not, it's the General Forum after all and you are one of the biggest cheerleaders on it, so definitely slip in a line or two about Pacquiao, why the **** not?!
     
  8. BrooklynMumin

    BrooklynMumin HOPKINS A " G " Full Member

    6,797
    4
    Aug 17, 2008
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  9. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Watch the fight again. You will see plenty of times where Abraham is standing stationary and not throwing and Dirrell is still able to land clean punches. You'll see him see him work the body and the then go right back upstairs. You'll see him hit Abraham with looping punches as well. Abraham had to come out of his shell and take chances because he was getting hit and was well behind. Yes, Clottey never came out his shell. However, Dirrell was able to succeed even when Abrham was in his shell. Good strategy and execution by Dirrell.
     
  10. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    :-( This post once again exposes your paranoia. The comparisson is very evident. People were making comparrisons between Chambers and Clottey after their fights as well. I'm guessing you didn't fly off the handle and throw a hissy fight when that happened. It's really sad that you get so offened by a comment meant highlight the talents of an up and coming fighter.
     
  11. horst

    horst Guest

    All that is important in that paragraph is the part highlighted in red. That's why it's a **** comparison. Abraham opened up throughout the fight, Clottey didn't. Totally different scenarios, end of story.

    Dirrell was excellent I agree, and that should have been the only point to this thread, the quality performances of him and Ward so far, the unnecessary yet characteristic little dig at the 'alleged' irrelevant great fighter was a "classless action". Would Dirrell have been as good if he was faced with a guy who had no intentions of winning the fight, but merely wanted to survive, and so defended desperately for the full 12 rounds? Quite obviously not. It would not have been possible, he would have found it more difficult.
     
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    The comparison is ****. Abraham and Clottey fought totally differently, therefore there is no 'comparison', there is only contrast. And that was not the intention of your comment at all, coward. It never is with you.
     
  13. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    Again, you're failing to recognized that Dirrell was landing solid blows even when Abraham was still in his shell. Now if Abraham had fough like that the whole fight, he wouldn't have been knocked down, but he still would've been busted up. That cut was opened up when Dirrell landed a hook on Abraham while he was till in that defensive. At the same time, had Abraham not opened up, he would've lost every round.
     
  14. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Still only interested in engaging in a ***** fest I see, sad.:-( I wonder why no other Pacquiao fans aren't in here crying since my comments were so offensive?
     
  15. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Interesting tournament it's turned out to be. Seems like the favorites change position with every fight that goes by. I guess that's what you get when you pit many world class fighters against each other with several different styles.

    Personally, I feel Dirrell should be 2-0 at this point and he's quickly becoming the favorite in my book.