The Super 6; Americans making a good account of themselves

Pac's body shots were alot more consistant and had a much greater effect despite him being so much smaller..

 

I dont give a **** about what you and the rest of the murderers row of stupidity (Eze,Darryl etc) think about me,i lost a bet with a clown on an internet forum and im not going to honor it,what you're going to do,sue me?maybe you can call Pac's lawyer.

 

I have never seen a fanbase who are so ****ing sensitive about anything you say about the guy. No one said Pac is a loser, or Pac didn't dominate Clottey. All you said was that you liked the way Dirrell handled the tutle shell defense better than the way Pac did.


In order to fully appreciate your opinion, they would have to realize that in a p4p sense, Abraham hits harder, comes on late with better stamina, applies pressure from the turtle shell, and generally has a higher workrate.



Pac pretty much had free reign to punch until his heart was content. Dirrell had to get around the turtle shell, while avoiding bombs. Big difference. And a dominant performance by Dirrell.

 

They didn't face the same turtle shell though, you biased ****. Pac had to fight a guy who hid behind his for 12 rounds. Dirrell faced a guy who was active, aggressive, and took far more chances. A **** comparison, because Clottey and Abraham used the shell differently, no basis for comparison.

 

****, both lawsuits would probably yield about the same value.

 

It is a shame. You know one way to avoid arguing over Pacquiao in a thread about the Super Six? Don't criticize Pacquiao in a thread about the Super Six. Keep a thread about the Super Six to... the Super Six. You'd think that was obvious, but apparently not.

 

Bollocks. Dirrell was faced with a clearly easier task, because Abraham wasn't hiding in the shell for 36 minutes.

 

Pacquiao is the smaller man, thus had more energy and can throw more punches.

Pacquiao simply overwhelmed Clottey, he never actually hit him. But Im sure Pac would have KO'd him if Clottey had the balls to come out his shell like Abraham.

However, Pacquiao tried to hard at times. Every shot he threw was a power shot, Dirrell was probing Abraham, then would find his weak point and land. Pac should have been more technical, he worked too hard in that fight, he was visibly exhausted afterwards.

It was opened by several left hands. It started gushing when their heads clashed.

And as Shaw said, Abraham had looked like he was in a car crash after the fight.

 

anyways we are so far apart on this we'll just agree to disagree. I can't believe you think Dirrell's performance against Abraham was more dominant than Pacquiao's performance against Clottey. Clottey couldn't do **** all to Pac during the entire fight. Dirrell was dominated in the 10th round and decked hard and seemed to be losing momentum in the championship rounds.

 

The point that he was making is that Dirrell was able to score a lot of body and head shots while Abraham was using the high guard. If you're insinuating that Dirrell only scored big when Abraham dropped his hands to engage him then either you didn't watch the fight or you're just talking out of your ass.

 

:-(

 

:happy I'm glad someone else has noticed this weasel's approach on this site. He is a spineless bag of ****.