The Super Middleweight Division

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PrideOfWales, Dec 10, 2008.


  1. Jinx

    Jinx Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,839
    0
    Aug 18, 2004
    you have Froch and Pascal over Taylor....that makes this thread a joke....
     
  2. buster007

    buster007 FAB 4 R A GAY PORN CLUB Full Member

    13,179
    435
    Sep 10, 2008
    i just think that with bika he is still improving. when he fought calzaghe he was relatively inexperienced.

    he has also showed some real mongrel in him and he won't be a pushover.
     
  3. Jaaames

    Jaaames Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,854
    0
    Feb 16, 2006
    Bika early in his career fought Sam Soliman to a SD, fought f for a world title, giving Markus Beyer all he could handle before that fight was ruled a NC... He lost to Calzaghe but gave him a tough night, He gave Lucian a difficult night, Won the Contender 3 (which was probably the best season of them all and also avenging a loss to Soliman), He showed some improvement in the Manfredo fight... Straightening up his punches.... He's still top 10 to me, just the lower half, but could easily fight his way to the upper portion...

    Andrade/Bika would be fun BUT..........

    Bika/Taylor would be much more fun to watch........
     
  4. henrik

    henrik fasthands Full Member

    2,816
    0
    Oct 1, 2006
    Let´s hope that all that talent end up with some exiting fights beetween these SMW.
    I would LOVE kessler-Froch...or Kessler -Taylor.And Froch-Bute....IMO great fights all of them.
     
  5. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008
    In that division, we can take a hat, put the top ten names in it and pick 2 of them, there is a great chance it makes a good fight. Many good young fighters but still, at many degrees, unproven. That makes it exciting.
     
  6. québecwarrior

    québecwarrior Georges 'Rush' St-Pierre Full Member

    6,938
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    Froch and Pascal before Bute?
    Are you out of your mind?
     
  7. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008

    I think his mind is possessed by the Frochmania syndrome.
     
  8. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,241
    5,919
    Apr 30, 2006
    1. Kessler
    2. Bute
    3. Taylor
    4. Froch
    5. Inkin
    6. Andrade
    7. Bika
    8. Dirrell
    9. Pascal
    10. Karoly Balzsay

    That's my top 10 right now, but to be honest there's not a ton of separation between most of the list. Even going 15-20 deep can get you some great matchups as this is one of the deepest divisions in the sport right now IMO. Guys like Ward, Miranda, and Sartison are just on the outside and would be competitive with most of the top 10, and Danny Jacobs has a ton of potential as well and is progressing very nicely.
     
  9. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    The list is a bigger joke than the poster.How can you have Froch and Pascal over Bute and Taylor?This is where nuthugger is defined.
     
  10. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008

    I think it's even past the line. We need a new word. :blood
     
  11. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Frochugger maybe:D
     
  12. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,386
    0
    Apr 8, 2007
    Froch is nr. 4 or 5 if I'm positive
    after Kessler- Bute- Taylor- Inkin- Andrade
     
  13. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008

    I like it. Frochugger. :lol:
     
  14. Joe Pirrelly

    Joe Pirrelly Member Full Member

    278
    0
    Jan 25, 2008
    I'm gonna say it and take the ridicule and then pull this post up in 18 months. If i don't i know you will.

    1. Froch
    2. Kessler
    3. Taylor
    4. Inkin
    5. Pascal
    6. Bute
     
  15. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008

    Your list is ok to me. What the Frochuggers ;) forget is that a ranking is based on what a boxer has accomplished. Maybe Froch wille be number 2 in a year. He has to fight big names and win to do it. It's not a what I think he is capable thing. It's what he has actually done. I doubt he'll ever raise to number 2 spot but I can be wrong.