The "sweet science" hipsters are hypocrites

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Babality, Dec 2, 2016.


  1. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,288
    15,123
    Dec 6, 2008
    They are all about "skill", "hit and not get hit". Yet they are the ones who condone all the dirty stuff, like elbows, clinching, headbutts, etc.

    If your fighter can't win without that, then he's not as good as you thought. Those moves are all illegal.

    Most of these elite boxing masters can't win without that. They can't do the whole "hit and not get hit" thing without all kinds of dirty **** in the process.

    They are so called boxing "purists", but a purist would obviously prefer pure boxing and look down on dirty tactics.

    They also make fun of brawlers or boxer punchers, yet most of these stick to their fists to do the damage. That's more pure than anything else.
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,538
    83,356
    Nov 30, 2006
    You're talking about one guy.

    Ward isn't the poster boy for scientific boxing. Strawman fail.
     
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,393
    240,941
    Nov 23, 2013
    Snob!!!!!:monoloco:
     
  4. mafioso

    mafioso Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,889
    620
    Jun 10, 2013
    the clinch is legal
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,538
    83,356
    Nov 30, 2006
    But not sweet.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,538
    83,356
    Nov 30, 2006
    Nor slick. By definition it means you have failed at or foregone attempting slickness.
     
  7. MonkeyEarMuffs

    MonkeyEarMuffs Dynamite Upper! Full Member

    593
    4
    Nov 14, 2009
    I'd like this thread evolve into something...
     
  8. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    7,140
    5,026
    Oct 22, 2015
    If you judge other fans based on what kind of athletes they enjoy watching some serious self evaluating may be in order. It's not that serious
     
  9. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,844
    15,621
    Nov 9, 2015
    So if they advocate the latter they cannot be categorized as the former. Defeating ones own argument in the first sentence is an elite level fail.
     
  10. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,393
    240,941
    Nov 23, 2013
    Like I said in my thread on the subject most sweet science guys are full of **** and have no idea what they're actually watching and they just go with the American or Cuban that runs or clinches a lot and screams "schooled" at the top of their lungs, and when someone they don't happen to be a fan of have immaculate skills they never seem to notice.
     
  11. devon2

    devon2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    105
    Jun 30, 2013
    Nope. Marquess of Queenberry rule #2 "No wrestling or hugging allowed."
     
    rathalos and OvidsExile like this.
  12. mafioso

    mafioso Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,889
    620
    Jun 10, 2013
    a real clinch is not wrestling but most fighter dont clinch they hold or headlock i admit that
     
  13. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,288
    15,123
    Dec 6, 2008
    Yeah because Ward is the only boxer in history to abuse these tactics. Not like Hopkins just retired and was called "crafty" and "slick" for headbutting, faking low blows and clinching. How can you follow boxing for so long and come up with that answer?
     
    OvidsExile likes this.
  14. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,288
    15,123
    Dec 6, 2008
    That makes zero sense. How is that an untouchable subject?
     
  15. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    There is quite a bit of irony I see in comments from a lot of you fools with recent happenings. Lots of hypocrites, and you're a special kind of stupid if you think it only goes one way (naturally, opposite of the side of the fence you lay)! I've been sitting here laughing at this forum for the last year and a half, straight comedy.