Charles Darwin was considered "below average" of intellect, and was described as his father or an early teacher as "too dreamy" to ever make a success of himself and "below the common standard of intellect. When he found his voice, he became one of the greatest intellects in history, but he might have "failed" that test (or not). But I'm not saying Ali was intellectual. I'm saying that all the things that have been claimed on behalf of Tunney that supposedly make him an intellectual, can be claimed on behalf of Ali also.
Bobby Czyz was a Mensa member, scoring in the top 2% of IQ test takers, yet I'm not sure that his ring acumen matches up to some of the other fighters we're discussing here...
I think I would have to look at their accomplishments in context (was Tunney asked to lecture about Shakespeare solely because he was Gene Tunney or did his understanding impress people?) so I couldn't comment on the actual differences with any degree of authority. What I can comment on is the perceived differences and those favor Tunney because the activities Tunney engaged in, like the study of the classics, and the company he kept, like pen pal George Bernard Shaw, are considered of a higher intellectual cache than Ali's. As to Darwin that was in a way that I probably didn't express properly my point. Ali was not stupid, he simply never bothered to learn. Richard Feynman supposedly had an average iq. And Lionel Messi is probably, if asked to compete in athletic test like the decathlon, pretty mediocre. That is a matter of inclination more than application though.
Personally, I believe Ali to be extremely intelligent, as demonstrated by his self marketing genius. The 2nd Liston fight (fiasco) followed by the draft dodging (conscientious objector) related exile might have ruined another man's boxing career. Ali, however, was able to rise above this with clever, albeit crass, PR work. Through it all, in many ways he truly spoke for a generation.
This is part of what I mean. It may exist - it seems likely that it does - but i've seen no evidence of Tunney's "study of the classics" - what evidence of this exists? People in this thread, I think, on page one, are out and out dismissing fighters who have achieved PHDs as even being the equal of Gene Tunney because he "studied the classics". What study did he undertake? Did he achieve a doctrate? Or was he more akin to Marilyn Monroe's "study of the classics" which amounted to a determination to better herself in a direction generally not held as being crucial to her own professional success? Does it mean he read good books a lot? If so I would like to declare myself the intellectual bastion to ESB. He did, as I understand it, lecture on Shakespeare. I also understand that those lectures were well received. At the time he gave those lectures he was famous, and almost certainly did better than would generally have been expected. I feel sure, being no expert, that with notice, I could construct a series of decent lectures on Shakespeare. Because i'm not an expert, I'm sure people would be pleasantly surprised with what I'd come up with - or they might be ****e, but the point is, it's doable. It doesn't impart upon someone, in my opinion, some excess of intellectual legitimacy. I think it proves he wasn't an idiot though. He definitely hung about with George Bernard Shaw - but if Ali had hung about with Gabriel Garcia Marquez in the late sixties, would that have made him "more intellectual" than Tunney? I think probably not. A very very strong picture of Tunney was presented by the 1920s press it definitely stuck. It might have been bang on, but if it was, this is independent of the facts of his intellectual giantism, at least as I understand them. However, I don't hate Tunney or anything and i'd be happy to be educated on this point for the most part - i'm not keen on his being the defacto answer here though without that evidence.
There are different types of intelligence to consider. Ali had superb, all-universe comedic timing, and could improvise within his well-known shtick as well as any comedian/actor could ever hope to do. If that's considered criteria for intelligence, then he's certainly got to be in the discussion. Then again, if we rate intelligence simply as a matter of classical knowledge, then let's consider that Ricardo "Finito" Lopez was pretty well-read (favoring Gabriel Garcia Marquez and Herman Hesse, among others). Either way, I'm with McGrain...Tunney isn't the automatic choice for this category.
I think I get where you are going. Anyway I'll stand by Euwe, who was a doctorate in mathematics as well as a chess world champion and Edwin Hubble who was one of the greatest astrophysicist of the 20th century.
Ali, too, had a very famous intellectual pen pal -- Bertrand Russell, a Nobel Prize winner in literature who is also considered one of the top minds in math, logic and philosophy of the 20th century. They met before the Clay-Cooper fight and the boxer asked Russell -- he had no idea who the man was -- who he thought would win. Russell responded that he held Cooper in high esteem but opined that Clay would win. Clay said something along the lines of "Well then you aren't as dumb as you look." Informed of who Russell was, and that he had just insulted one of the great minds of the time, Ali wrote Russell a letter of apology and they struck up a friendship. They continued to correspond until Russell's death almost 10 years later.
Russell is a great philosophical and mathematical mind, but it's always ****ed me off that he and Winston Churchill won the Nobel Prize in literature, when there were so much better writers around who never got one. I've read Russell's short stories and they are nothing special. Sometimes the academy can't find a way to properly honor someone they like so they give them a Nobel Prize in literature, except in these cases it means guys like Vladimir Nabokov, Ezra Pound, or James Joyce got snubbed. They gave an early award to the historian Mommsen instead of Tolstoy. One thing, which hasn't been mentioned about Tunney is that he wrote an autobiography. Writing a book should be a sign of some intellectual acumen. And the Klitschko brothers, aside from having PHDs also speak four or five languages. Let's not forget that.
Tunney was a snob who made sure that in his leisure moments he was always photographed with a classic book in hand .In later years he admitted he alienated the fight crowd and the public in general, by his condescending attitude. I've seen no evidence he was intellectually superior to many other boxers. I know one guy who possibly fits in this discussion but I'm not going to name him because it will only bring his chief hater into action !