The Ten Calzagments

10 years of watching Joe C? Wow. Kudos mate! :good

I've been a fan of ALL FIGHTERS since the late 80's. Either way, with all that accumulated knowledge, you have nothing else better to post about then how great Joe is :roll: and how bad Taylor is.

And you don't even debate anything worth debating because you place your opinion too much as fact. Here's a fact, you're a twat.:good

 

I talk about plenty of subjects, Taylor is a current event, he won't be mentioned much after the aftermath of him getting destroyed and that will be nice, because he was wrongfully ranked in the first place.

My opinion is not fact, your opinion is regurgitated and the only subjects you bother with is the welterweight division and then of course retorting to my or CHJ's material.

 

You're opinion is based on your nuthugging of Calzaghe. That has become blatantly obivous on recent posts by you. You can ***** and cry, and that is what you are doing, about Taylor's place on some mythical P4P list, but at least he's fought dangerous foes. Your hero, Joe C, has faced mainly hand picked chumps that you have to build up.

If my opinion was regurgitated, as you claim, I wouldn't be one who disagrees 99% of the time with the rest of the nuthuggers.

 

Ah, Blockhead.

You're more enjoyable to debate with than Lance and NervousXtian, but you also have to go, even with the comedic element that you bring, I'm sorry it's that way, you just picked the wrong fighter and have too big a mouth.:yep

 

Like I said, you don't debate. You post bull**** opinion and try to pass it as fact. Ohm that and kiss CKH's ass. atsch

Say what you want about me, but at least I don't act as if I am some know-it-all.

 

Again, that's the way you percieve it. I tend to stick up for all underrated talents that do not get their credit and chances, Joan Guzman for example, in my avatar, he's 31 and fading and was heavily avoided like the plague for a while, just one example.

Calzaghe happens to be my favourite fighter and in the middle of MW-LHW, which is a deep region in general and lesser fighters than he take claim to boxing's highest regard, while he was stuck with only limited chances for years, so I seek to put things to perspective in all area's for ALL fighters, not just the Calzaghe situation, I go over this pretty often and tend to support any underrated fighter.

What I mean by 'regurgitated' is that you only follow the names essentially and lack the analysation skills to seek out and spot underrated guys, except for Margarito, whom was a **** fighter to begin with and the fact that you thought he was going to lay claim to top Welterweight wins proves my point here. People went on how Margarito was 'underrated', everyone bought it. People go on about things and others don't see it and they buy it.

Do you think DLH would ever fight Dzinziruk, or any name for that matter? Of course not, too dangerous, but Dzinziruk would smoke DLH and that level of 'name' fighter and that's the tragedy involved.

Grow up and learn not to take everything to heart, you are dealing with a forum.

I'm not even going to discuss this material after the aftermath of Taylor/Pavlik is done, in which you all will hopefully be in agreement on the subject of Taylor, in which I will not seek to insult or brutally dish out any crow, just seek to collectively educate everyone on the subject of this overrated joke, who I'd despise if I was never a fan of Calzaghe to begin with, I have despised the overrating of this **** known as Taylor all the way back to 2004, when Calzaghe/Taylor match ups were not even in the question.

Anyways, that's all I am going to say.

 

Ah, but I do debate, you just aren't around on any subjects not involving what I stated you get involved with above.

 

Ah, but I do debate, you just aren't around on any subjects not involving what I stated you get involved with above.

 

You write a lot, but you don't really say much. I get the idea you're the type who likes to see their own words more then others.

And please, don't go ruin Guzman for a lot of other fans. I have been watching him since his 122 days. You're probably another 'bandwagoner' with him too.:-(

 

I've seen you 'debate'. You almost say the same thing over and over. :roll:

 

I'm not much of a Guzman fan per say, but I am in support of him getting his chance to shine, it's been long enough.

And I do debate well, again, you just have little to no realistic boxing knowledge. If I had no debating skills, then most posters would say so, for the most part, they like the addition that I bring to a debate and likewise I do with them.

Boxing is dynamic, it's a learning experience, you're just in the 1st grade, while we're all in high school and therefore you make it personal when you don't agree because you cannot debate back worth a damn when it comes to technicality, which technicality is what I run off of when making decisions.

Blockhead for all his nasty faults, at least has a semi-informed stance, with lots of flaws, you're just lost.

 

I guess if a bunch of teenybopper fans think you are a good poster, you must be right. Dude...you've become more ridiculous then anything of late.

You can say what you want about me, pretty much all of what you are saying is said out of spite anyway. You're just a Joe C fan, not a real boxing fan anyway.

And now I'll leave you to play "boxing expert" again. Ciao kid.

 

No, I'm a boxing fan first, but you wouldn't pick that up to begin with, going back to my assessment of your position of course.

 

Sure you are. Just like the nuthuggers here aren't nuthuggers.

 

Anyone surprised that as soon as the Calzagments were received, strife and disunity quickly followed? I am not...:-(