The Tony's slug it out: Galento vs Tucker

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Nov 3, 2018.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,169
    11,647
    Sep 21, 2017
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,428
    45,911
    Feb 11, 2005
    Tucker clowns Two Ton.

    Are they even the same species?
     
  3. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,459
    36,613
    Jul 4, 2014
    Dear lord. Tucker was a very good boxer with a marvelous 6'5" frame. If he didn't do a lot exceptionally, he did everything well.

    Galento was a 5'8" fat guy who knew almost nothing about boxing. He did have natural nearly superhuman strength, as you had to to be an ice man in those days. He would pick up barrels that most people couldn't even roll and walk them upstairs all day.

    But the guy was not a real athlete. Besides that prodigious strength, his next greatest asset was his mob connections that allowed him to employ every dirty trick in the book.

    Tucker is so much better I think he would find a way to get him out of there quick, even though he was not the biggest puncher.
     
  4. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,259
    6,987
    Nov 22, 2014
    It depends. Tony from the early to mid 1930's when he was in good shape most likely beats Tucker, since Tucker doesn't bring anything to the table that Galento hasn't seen before. However, if its the Galento from the late 30's that always showed up fat then Tucker most likely wins by a late stoppage after picking himself off the canvas once or twice.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    FromMay 1931 until June1936 Galento lost to the following.
    Schaaf no disgrace
    Risko ditto
    Brown so so
    Gainer
    Perroni
    And these lower tier guys
    Dorval
    Winston
    Tow
    Delaney
    Mader
    Gallagher
    Cavalier
    Gagnon

    Tucker out boxes any version of Galento imo.
     
  6. GOAT Primo Carnera

    GOAT Primo Carnera Member of the PC Fan Club Full Member

    2,665
    2,687
    Jan 28, 2018
    Galento TKO5.

    He was a better David Tua of that era.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    He was a damn sight slower that Tua who also had a decent righthand.If Tua caught you he finished you off.Galento's feet were stuck in treacle.
     
  8. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,461
    35,975
    Jan 8, 2017
    No it's almost certainly Tucker who wins this though he may get marked up a little. But he isn't getting dropped .Going the distance with Tyson provided proof of his chin.He'd either stop Galento or soundly out point him .
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,752
    44,309
    Apr 27, 2005
    Tucker's effort against Tyson is a good barometer that he would get past Tony pretty comfortably. Sure Tony would try his crude roughhouse tactics but Tucker has a superb chin and plenty of size to tie him up when need be. He's also not afraid to let his hands go in close. I wouldn't be surprised to see Tucker get a stoppage in the later rounds one way or another. Galento cuts a bit and could well be DQ'd as well.
     
  10. Contro

    Contro Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,882
    4,699
    Jun 7, 2016
    And he had legs+ the "Ali knock off style" (not meant disparigingly) wasn't around back then so galento would be looking at something completely new.


    Tucker was good enough to hit prime mike Tyson with a triple left hook.

    Galento isn't doing anything to him
     
  11. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,169
    11,647
    Sep 21, 2017
    Yes. Yes they are.

    Despite what people think about Galento, he was a tough fighter with a mean left hook. And he beat many top fighters of his era.
     
    Jackomano likes this.
  12. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,169
    11,647
    Sep 21, 2017
    Now you're cooking with hot grease!!
     
    GOAT Primo Carnera likes this.
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,560
    27,187
    Feb 15, 2006
    This looks like an accurate assessment.
     
  14. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,259
    6,987
    Nov 22, 2014
    Only problem is Tyson for as talented as he was had virtually no inside game. Tillis and Bonecrusher Smith realized this too late in their fights, but once they did they neutralized Tyson's effectiveness. Buster Douglas and Holyfield went to work early on Tyson on the inside and both beat him easily. Galento wouldn't be getting manhandled on the inside like Tyson was. Tucker's inside game also wasn't that great. If you switched out Tucker with a prime Bowe, who was an excellent fighter on the inside I can see him giving Galento a much harder time. Galento also had a better left hook than Tyson.

    Tony Tucker vs. Eddie Lopez
    This content is protected
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  15. GOAT Primo Carnera

    GOAT Primo Carnera Member of the PC Fan Club Full Member

    2,665
    2,687
    Jan 28, 2018
    My goodness....could you please solve that pathological moronically typing incidents of yours?

    This sheer amount of imbecile discharge is simply unbearable :hollering::vomiton22je:
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2018