The top 10 heavyweights never to fight for the title.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Mar 24, 2008.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,692
    30,581
    Jun 2, 2006
    I saw Spencer fight Leotis Martin in London ,terrific scrap ,it was named fight of the year.
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,226
    49,556
    Apr 27, 2005
    You know for some silly reason i thought Dokes - Bowe wasn't for a title :oops:

    139 seconds, damn.
     
  3. RoccoMarciano

    RoccoMarciano Blockbuster Full Member

    2,892
    16
    Jan 15, 2007
    Perhaps it wasn't that memorable? :D
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,130
    53,510
    Feb 11, 2005
    Ruiz.

    That stuff he did for world titles I would not really call fighting.
     
  5. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,791
    2,391
    Aug 26, 2004
    Joe Mesi in modern times....I guess a lot of the fighters that did not get a chance to fight for the linear title because of the other B.S. titles..gave the Champ an excuse not to fight the best.....Larry Holmes I like as a fighter but he did not fight PinklonTHomas, Big John Tate, Mike(HERCULES) Weaver, Mike Dinamite Dokes, Greg Page,Gerrie Coetzee and these men were not given the chance to fight for the Linear throne..could you imagine if Louis,Marciano Ali did not fight the best of there times, yet there are fans who overlook Holmes overlook
     
  6. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    I am a rex layne fan, but Eddie would easily box his ears off. Eddie and Zora belong at the top of the list, as does cleveland williams all fought in a very underated era in heavyweight history. All 3 looked like A level skills/talent on film.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Dokes fought for the linear title against bowe, he doesnt belong on the list
     
  8. Marciano Frazier

    Marciano Frazier Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    57
    Jul 20, 2004
    Folley and Williams both fought for the heavyweight title.
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Janitor here is my list


    1. Harry Wills
    2. Sam Langford
    3. Peter Jackson
    4. Elmer Ray
    5. Joe Jeanette
    6. George Godfrey
    7.. Eddie Machen
    8. Clarence Henry
    9. Sam Mcvey
    10. Lee Q Murray
     
  10. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    99
    Feb 18, 2006
    I rate Layne higher because Layne did defeat Walcott and Charles while Machen failed throughout his career against his very best opponents. I understand a strong case can be made for Machen who was more skilled, more consistent over a longer career, and lost only to contenders.


    One thing about Machen. He was widely criticized while active for being a one-handed fighter. He rarely used his right and when he did it was largely ineffective. With that weakness, I think he would have had problems in most eras beating the very best men.

    I guess you could view the late fifties and early sixties as underrated, with Patterson, Johansson, Machen, Folley, Williams, and perhaps Harold Johnson as the dominant fighters besides Liston, but certainly not a uniquely tough era. The mid to late forties for example had Walcott, Charles, Bivins, Ray, Murray, and Thompson, with Louis the champion, and the tough spoilers below this tier including Bettina, Maxim, Sheppard, Godoy, Baksi, and a slew of others.