The Top 100 Pound for Pound All-Time Greats

It's not meant to be biased just a point of view he is one fighter I feel gets overrated because he is was a media favourite so in the building of his career the media were overly biased in his favour

To be honest I don't like the idea of James toney in the top hundred but that's a drugs use opinion

 

Whitaker up, Walcott down.

Dixon is fine where he is. Longevity counts and Dixon has it over Terrible Terry.

 

You a big Toney fan I didn't know

 

Still no Jersey Joe? How is this possible.

 

I agree whitaker up and Joe down... Not sure about moving Dixon though.

 

How is that even possible? He beat somebody in the top 10 TWO times. I and many other feel he beat somebody in tier no. 2 in their first fight. He again showed his class in the second fight with Louis by being considerably ahead on the cards before the 11th. He did better against Marciano than Charles did, in fact, he was winning that fight by a decent amount before the stoppage. He beat Elmer Ray and Joey Maxim x2 as well. Plus he beat a guy in tier no. 8 in Harold Johnson. He beat or should've got a victory over 3 guys "ahead" of him. I can name numerous fighters on here who don't have as many wins over guys in tiers as Walcott does. What do you mean not top 100 material?

 

Because Morales is greater :deal

 

Oh fine :cus!! I still love you, McG....


But Beau is in! My Beau! arty

 

Again you fail to address Mosley's Balco abuse in bringing up Oscar's losses but no problem pointing out his natural size advantage of the lower weights atsch

Stop being biased.

 

Great thread McG!!!!!! :happy :happy :bbb

 

Were they that mixed? I thought most said Whitaker up and Walcott down?

 

Tbh I'm cool with the standings as is. I also am cool with Pea moving up a tier since I always get **** rating him so high :yep

So Dixon down, Pea up.