The Top 100 Pound for Pound All-Time Greats

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Feb 15, 2013.


  1. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    184
    May 16, 2009
    I can see that
     
  2. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,577
    3,768
    May 4, 2012
    **** offfffff.
     
  3. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,577
    3,768
    May 4, 2012
    I'd put Jones higher on my personal list so seeing Jones so high on MacG's makes me warm and fuzzy

    As does Tunney outside the top 30. :smoke
     
  4. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    184
    May 16, 2009
    Don't swear at other poster's that's just so childish and this thread has been really good , don't ruin it
     
  5. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,577
    3,768
    May 4, 2012
    Did Oscar bang your wife? You thought he lost to Trinidad :patsch
     
  6. the_bigunit

    the_bigunit Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,940
    19
    Nov 12, 2012

    We both rank McLarnin and Canzoneri ahead of Hagler and Hearns.
     
  7. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    184
    May 16, 2009
    Not married mate was once never again to expensive , and you thought Oscar never wore a dress
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,369
    48,744
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's true, but Leonard bridged an incredible gap to Hagler, both in terms of time and weight. Leonard shouldn't be beating Hagler any more than Duran should be speaking of Leonard...speaking of Duran, Leonard of course beat a fighter ranked higher than any of them.

    More, head to head Hearns is among the very greatest of welterweights and Hagler is among the very greatest of middleweights and regardless of their unquestioned greatness, beating Hearns at WW and Hagler at MW is a huge task, I would say tougher than beating McLarnin and Canzoneri respectively. Arguable, though.
     
  9. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,577
    3,768
    May 4, 2012
    Tell me you felt Trinidad beat Oscar again :lol:
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,369
    48,744
    Mar 21, 2007
  11. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,577
    3,768
    May 4, 2012
    No one "feels" Trinidad beat Oscar. Unless they carry a certain flag :nono
     
  12. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    184
    May 16, 2009
    Sadly for you and Oscar the people that made the official decision did
     
  13. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,577
    3,768
    May 4, 2012
    There is a reason Holy/Lewis 1 and Trinidad/Oscar were in the same year.
     
  14. the_bigunit

    the_bigunit Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,940
    19
    Nov 12, 2012

    All great points.

    Leonard's victories over Hearns/Hagler may have been more difficult -- but they have their controversy. Almost balances the 'wins' out, if you will.

    And Ross beat Canzoneri and McLarnin twice.

    Canzoneri
    Canzoneri
    McLarnin
    McLarnin

    Hearns
    Hagler
    Duran
    Duran

    And after this, I think Ross' depth really pulls it put for him (Garcia 3x, Jannazo, Battilino, Farr, Miller, Hess, Datto, Fuller, Nebo, Pacho 2x, Baby Gans, Wallace, Woods, Manfredo 2x, Sherman, Burke, etc.,).

    But we could drag this out all day. I guess I see how it can go either way.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,369
    48,744
    Mar 21, 2007
    I have to agree with you. I had it 9-3. It might be Oscar's best performance :lol: But it's not the crux upon which this thread turns or even Oscar's ranking in it. There's no point, imo, in debating it because it just doesn't matter. Could get nasty, probably best left :thumbsup