This is a list by bleacher report, how bad is it? https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1436191-the-top-50-pound-for-pound-boxers-of-all-time#slide15
Not overly offensive, it has the right names (with the exception of Johnson and Tyson), just in the wrong places. I've seen worse
Was actually better than some of the boxing magazines latest offerings. But Cerdan is just a bad mention. And Greb at 11 lol.
neither do most human beings, which is why few if any ask about their lists on a boxing website....their other sports takes are equally poor but their website formatting is even worse!