The Transnational Boxing Rankings

Morrer IS the more complete fighter *and* has beaten better opposition than the TOMATO KAN Krusher. What is it about this simple FACT that you fail to comprehend?

 

Why does that mean he should stand to toe with him?

Mayweather is more complete than Maidana, I wouldn't advise him to stand toe to toe neither.

 

Morrer is the better fighter *and* the PROVEN bigger puncher. Morrer has *every* advantage over Kovalev. Sergei would be foolish to stand and trade with a fighter as good, strong and accomplished as Michael Moorer. Morrer goes through him like a hot knife through butter...

 

Who's Morrer?

 

I accept your surrender...

 

What surrender?

I'll go over my point again: no one should stand toe to toe with Kovalev.

 

Don't STAY ON Nonsense! Get into the work that is both SERIOUS, and IMPORTANT! : ) [If all they want are .02 cent inputs this STREAM! Their's MINE! : )]

 

Moorer has *every* advantage over the TOMATO KAN Krusher. Kovalev would be foolish to stand and trade with him...

 

:good

 

Mc laying down the law. I suspect if this was in his territory (Classic), he'd have deleted that **** in a jiffy.

 

Back to business.

McG, why is Zlaticanin so high? It's the one ranking on here that I can't get my head around.

I'd have thought Linares and Flanagan would now be a clear 1 and 2. Probably the winner of Barroso and Crolla being third.

 

Zlaticanin's position is well warranted, win over Burns, Petrov (Who only lost to Maidana in his prime) and still growing strong, and he just knocked out Redkach (Whom most people had a favourite if I remember clearly).

He is the best fighter of this division, I reckon.

 

Those 3 names don't really justify his place in my mind. Burns has been beaten loads now and the other two I've honestly never heard of.

 

WBC WBA IBF WBO "real" world championships. Gennady Golovikin aught to be sanctioned!