The Transnational Boxing Rankings

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Dec 13, 2012.


  1. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    alright I rewatched your rounds and I can see the case for Cloud in those rounds.....I think you are might be subtracting from Campillo because he showboated but hell, they had to look at Cloud and were thinking of stopping it in the 11th due to cuts and Cloud basically had one great shot in the 11th, Campillo showboated in the 12th but even with that landed some nice shots, are you scoring cloud moving forward and not landing and trying to make the fight, I get that, and I do that, but really, I am of the opinion that scoring even rounds is a good idea, a preferred idea, this silly notion that we must choose one or the other is absurd, really, both the 11th and the 12th favored Campillo but yes you can make a case for Cloud in both rounds, however, the whole case for Cloud getting a draw is a very shaky one, however, I must concede it IS not outside of the realm of reason, so I must concede if you are of that opinion than in your eyes a Cloud victory is not a robbery, however, you still shouldn't base your rankings as if the guy won, when it is still a much fairer and reasonable notion that he not only lost but lost cleanly and clearly.

    Therefore, its ridiculous to have Cloud ranked above Campillo and hence, the guy that REALLY beat Campillo, Kovalev.

    I mean, your ENTIRE ranking system is at the utter MERCY of corrupt judging. Think about that for a minute. If one of those judges actually scored the fight more reasonably your entire ranking system would be turned upside down because Campillo would have won.

    So, therefore, your entire ranking system is polluted by the very thing that we want to get away from when we make our own ranking systems, which is BS judging. When making your own ranking system you should not give so much credence to judging when it is this bad.

    I really want you to think about this: One judge goes the other way and your rankings are shuffled around. You should instead, just have everyone in your group evaluate the fights and weigh them accordingly. Its absolutely silly to have a guy that clearly got beaten given credit for clearly winning.
     
  2. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    At the very least Koralev should ahead of Cloud.

    Champ: Dawson
    1. Hopkins
    2. Pascal
    3. Koralev
    4. Cloud
     
  3. ludwig

    ludwig Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,049
    59
    Apr 29, 2010
    I like these 10 names, but can't agree with Lebedev at 5th. Lebedev deserved to get the decision vrs. Huck. Since then, Huck has taken on great opposition and performed well, but not as dominately as Lebedev has against slightly lesser opposition. I don't believe Hernandez's "wins" over Cunningham were convincing enough to crown him either. And the performance vrs. Ross raises more doubts. If anyone is 'the man' at cruiserweight, it's Lebedev, especially if/when he beats Guillermo Jones.

    Wlodarczyk should be 4th tops.

    1) Lebedev
    2) Huck
    3) YPH
    4) Wlod
    5) Afolabi
    6) Ross
    7) Tarver
    8) Kayode
    9) Arslan
    10) Alexeev
     
  4. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    Cruiser is a tough one to rank.

    There really isnt much to chose between the top 5, I think you could make a good argument for anyone of Huck, YPH or Lebedev as #1. Wlod & Ola are interchangable at #4-5 as well imo.

    Below that it gets even murkier; Tarver is suspended for steroids & Kayode has plans to move up to HW. Ross, Arslan & Palacios were all unlucky in title fights plus the likes of Masternek & Chakhkiev are on the rise.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    Thanks for taking the time, for me personally that should be end of conversation.

    We base our rankings upon the judges' decisions, almost, but not entirely completely.

    I've said it before and i'll say it again. Holyfield-Valuev was scored 100% for Holyfield by those watching on tv, 95% to Valuev by those scoring in the stadium.

    We have to be very, very conservative about changing results from an armchair. There is a reason that in the entire history of sports there is no sport that routinely changes the official result as it occured on the night. This includes some of the greatest travesties in sporting history, Argentina-England '86 (that one was funny though), Holyfield-Lewis I, etc. Our job is to react to what happens in the sport, not become a separate entity casually dictating results.

    On the other hand, boxing has been struggling and we acknowledge that. There IS a system whereby we can overturn flat-out robberies. This wouldn't qualify.

    It's not ridiculous at all; it's a fight that you concede could legitimately be called a draw where the champion was given the nod. It was a close fight that most people thought Campillo won but cannot be deemed a robbery by virtue of the fact that it was close.

    No, it's not.

    Yes. Changing any result that has occured would change the rankings.

    Q: Can Campillo-Cloud reasonably be scored for Cloud.

    A: Yes. From my perspective a judge seeing a single round differently from his position just feet from the action would make that a Cloud win on my card.

    No rankings system can "get away" from corrupt judging. IN the vision you have, a bunch of guys watching a fight on television decide who won that fight. That is not how the sport of boxing works. Boxing works along specific lines acknowledged by every rankings body in the history of the sport - to my knowledge, ours is the ONLY ONE that allows a decision for bad judging to be reversed, and has acted upon it. But what you are basically asking me to do here is try to "change" a result from a Campillo loss to a Campillo win in a fight I scored a draw. Even if I scored it 7-5, I wouldn't dream of trying to do that. Even if I scored it 8-4 it wouldn't be dependent upon a huge number of circumstances.

    But we disagree on how bad it is?

    Same as every weight class, every fight, every list compiled by every rankings body in the entire history of the sport.

    I don't personally consider this a particularly bad decision.

    I don't agree that he "clearly got beaten" and even if i did, that wouldn't be nearly enough to change a judges result.

    Why? Cloud has Campillo, Mack, Zuniga, Johnson, Woods, Gonzalez.

    Koralev has Campillo, Lionell Thompson (12-1), Darnell Boone (19-18), Roman Simakov, Grover Young (5-4).

    See the absolutely astronomical gulf in class between their two resumes? Even if Cloud had lost to Campillo, there is still a case for ranking Cloud ahead of him.

    Fightnews and Boxing Monthly both have Cloud ahead of Campillo and Koralev.


    But in the end, this is going to get sorted on Saturday. If Cloud wins, he's beaten the fighter that is #2 and probably would have ended up at #2 regardless of the ruling on Cloud-Campillo. If he loses, he's below all the guys you are fretting about.

    The truth will out.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    I disagree. My scorecard:

    MARCO HUCK SD12 DENIS LEBEDEV

    HUCK:2,3,5,8,10,11
    LEBEDEV:1,4,6,7,9,12

    So I have this one a draw.

    Not sure why this has become a little controversial as a result next door, you could score it any one of three ways without getting a serious argument from me. The only round I felt uncomfortable about scoring was the 12th, so for me, if there had to be a winner, Huck was the right choice.

    Having said that, there were a lot of close rounds that could have gone either way depending upon your scoring criteria. But definitely not the robbery some tend to make out and an absorbing contest.


    That's not to say you shouldn't base your rankings on how you perceive results, but it is to say that an organisational body wouldn't go changing the result of this fight. Hence, a close win for Huck (which does enhance Lebedev's standing I guess) is the result we would act upon.

    We'd tend to look at condership first and foremost.

    They don't have to be convincing, but yeah, we agree there's no champ.

    I think he definitely has an argument, he's in my top 5, but he's so determined not to fine one of the main men, I can't say I care too much.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, it's horrible, which sucks, because a year ago i considered it the best division in boxing.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think this avatar lends me a certain moral authority?
     
  9. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    Its still my favourite division, though lacking major stars its highly competitive & regularly produces excellent fights.

    2013 has been poor so far & Don King getting involved doesnt bode well for the immediate future.
     
  10. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    Well McGrain you are alright with me, you put a lot of thought into this and I respect that, although I think a fight that, if you stretch it to the limit, could possibly be a draw, yet a much more reasonable judgement is a 4 point victory for the defeated man, although I think its unreasonable to tally it up as a victory for the guy who appeared to lose, I get your thinking.

    But you did basically admit that your system is at the mercy of what these guys decide, to some extent, because you are acknowledging them as having been there to see it live and allowing that to over ride what virtually everyone else saw. Thats fine. But I can get that kind of rankings from a million places.

    So yes we do part ways. I can't see this working for you over the long run though because it won't have a strong relevance to hardcore fans when you explain to them that their own reasoning and own eyes are being trumped by poor decisions that you must afford for.

    btw, just because you can come up with a draw if you give cloud the benefit of the doubt in several rounds, does not in my mind make it close. You are acting like the 11th and 12th rounds were very very tight, and the truth is most people would agree that Campillo won them both, I'm only saying that I can see your side of it. I'm a reasonable person. You have to be very Cloudesque to come up with that draw, most neutral unaffected people would not only call this fight a Campillo victory, but two, or even four point won, clearly. That is my point. Boxing writers, fighters, all over the net, twitter, were telling us this was a robbery, and a major one.

    And you are actually factoring this into your rankings as a W for Campillo.

    But anyways I get what you are doing, I just don't know who this kind of thing is going to appeal to.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    We can overturn any poor decisions we think are locks.

    The fight you've presented as an example isn't a lock.

    As to who it's appealing to...I'm not sure. There are about a dozen websites out there that have taken them and this is one of the biggest. We get a lot of hits. There's other **** afoot. We shall see.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,002
    48,095
    Mar 21, 2007
    Any pressing opinions on what should be done with Cloud?
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,486
    21,889
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'd probably go

    Dawson
    Hopkins
    Pascal
    Koralev
    Cloud
    Campillo
    Cleverly
    Bellew
    Shumenov
    Braemer

    Something like that anyways. Cloud-Campillo is tricky. I had Campillo winning but he just got absolutely destroyed by someone who came from nowhere whereas Cloud lost a competitive fight to someone ranked above him anyways.
     
  14. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    nice job getting rid of tajbert
     
  15. USA Rob

    USA Rob Boxing Addict banned

    5,610
    0
    Dec 22, 2012
    this is how I have it McGrain. Braehmer needs to be in the top 10 for me. Cloud should go below Campillo. Were pretty much the same elsewhere.

    Champion Vacant
    1. Chad Dawson
    2. Bernard Hopkins
    3. Jean Pascal
    4. Sergie Kolarov
    5. Nathan Cleverly
    6. Beibut Shumenov
    7. Jurgan Braehmer
    8. Gabrio Campillo
    9. Tavoris Cloud
    10. Karo Murat


    Champion Chad Dawson
    1. Bernard Hopkins
    2. Tavoris Cloud
    3. Jean Pascal
    4. Sergey Kovalev
    5. Nathan Cleverly
    6. Beibut Shumenov
    7. Gabriel Campillo
    8. Karo Murat
    9. Issac Chilemba
    10. Tony Bellew