The Transnational Boxing Rankings

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Dec 13, 2012.


  1. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    322
    Dec 12, 2005
    Check the rankings tomorrow, the Board is debating them now. Tuesday is when the rankings are updated.
     
  2. Vysotskyy

    Vysotskyy Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,457
    386
    Oct 1, 2013
    Over 40 species of birds don't fly genius.

    [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flightless_bird[/url]
     
  3. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    16,150
    12
    Jan 14, 2011
    I know Vysotskyy, I thought it was 39 . But you knew the point i was making...
     
  4. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,752
    3,947
    Jun 13, 2012
    Could Crawford be the lineal champion if he beats Beltran? Sometimes, the winner of the fight between the #1 and #3 fighters is the lineal champion.
     
  5. Vysotskyy

    Vysotskyy Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,457
    386
    Oct 1, 2013
    Why is Quillin #2 in the last two years he's beat N'Dam, Guerrero, Rosado, Konecny during the same time Geale has Adama, Sturm, Mundine, Wood does a SD loss hurt your rating that much? Matinez just got massacred and is still #3. There only relevant wins are N'Dam and Sturm which aren't even close.

    Also why is N'dam at 10 he's beat no one in the last two years except an ancient Zuniga who had lost 3 of his last 4 going in and his best career win is Bursak. In the same time Korobov has beat Nunez, Brewer, Duran, Edwards, Uzcategui he's more deserving of the 10 spot.
     
  6. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    564
    Dec 2, 2013
    HA, cotto the middleweight (160lb.) 'champion'. what a joke.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,796
    51,822
    Mar 21, 2007
    Do you think he is too high or too low?

    I think he could be a spot lower myself, but i'm happy with the board's placement of him. Deposed Champions will rarely go tumbling in the way you want to see here, even if they are massacred.

    Here, I disagree with you. Korobov isn't there yet and this is illustrated by the fact that he beat Drewer, yes, but in an eight round contest. He isn't fighting over the twelve round distance yet. Now, that doesn't prohibit a fighter's inclusion but it does help to illustrated areas in which he is untested but in which N'Dam is experienced. N'Dam's ranking above Korobov illustrates the board's preference for N'Dam as an opponent for Cotto than Korobov's; that's probably close to inarguable, whatever you may personally prefer to see.
     
  8. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    24
    Jan 29, 2011
    Why is Kolodziej above Kalenga at cruiser?

    Kalenga clearly has better wins, his only loss was an awful hometown decision & he holds a (paper) world title
     
  9. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    16,150
    12
    Jan 14, 2011
    Gamboa said he's going down to 130 . Rank him at number 2 ahead of mikey who is ducking him.
     
  10. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,121
    22
    Aug 25, 2009
    He beat the previous Middle weight champ Martinez who beat Pavlik, who beat Taylor who beat Hopkins WBA, WBC ,WBO and IBF champ.

    Seems clear that Cotton is champ at 160 lbs.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,796
    51,822
    Mar 21, 2007
    **** that title.

    As to Kalenga-Kulikauskis, I agree with you that Kalenga won, but I don't htink the decision was robbery territory. I thought Kalenga missed a lot, was absolutely blowing out his arse, and that Kulikauskis was backing him up a bit in nine is crazy. Allowing for the point deduction, which i'm sure you didn't think was corrupt,

    KALENGA: 1,2,4,5,7,8,10
    KULIKAUSKIS:3,6*,9

    96-93

    *Kal had a point deducted.

    But that is not why he is at #10. He is at #10 because he was not ranked for Kal-Kul. As you probably know, other rankings tend to admit the judges decision for rankings purposes. TBRB do try to overturn bad decisions. I think that this one 1) Doesn't qualify as an out and out robbery (not the same as my being comfortable with the decision 2) Probably wouldn't have been overturned by the board and 3) wasn't considered for overturning by the board. Not every fight is considered. I'm sure you understand that this is not possible.

    So he makes do with #10, and will gain spots with each victory.
     
  12. shoe

    shoe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,560
    564
    Dec 2, 2013
    lineal doesn't mean **** when you never have, never will fight at 160 lb. and clearly aren't in the league of the best 160 lber. seems clear you need a few surgeries to figure that out. not that rankings mean anything.
     
  13. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,752
    3,947
    Jun 13, 2012
    Like it or not, Cotto is the lineal champion. He beat the previous lineal champ, Martinez.

    Being the lineal champion doesn't necessarily mean that you're the best fighter in your division.

    On another topic, if Crawford beat Mikey Garcia, would you guys put him in the top 10 P4P list?
     
  14. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    322
    Dec 12, 2005
    Yes.

    Yes, it does happen sometimes. But it shouldn't.

    A vacant divisional throne should only be filled after an official winner is declared after the two best in the division fight it out. The involvement of #3, #4, #5, #6, or whatever misses the point of what the champion is. The two best, no one less.
     
  15. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    322
    Dec 12, 2005
    Absolutely. And it's surprising how many informed boxing fans just can't figure that out. It's a basic fact.

    That would be a tough sell. Gonzalez is #10 and Crawford has real work to do before that, in my opinion at least.