The Transnational Boxing Rankings

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Dec 13, 2012.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, I think it was, and then it was vindicated (Which does help). There are definitely other possibilities, but I'm happy with Froch's ranking, I don't find it absurd or anything at all. That's fortunate.

    But even if it wasn't, I'm concerned by your suggestion (implied) that guys get together and re-write histories rankings. Retrospective re-writing of rankings is tempting but of grave concern because it puts emphasis on rhetoric rather than reality - in other words, the fighter with the representatives who make their case most powerfully will tend to have the highest ranking in situations like this where uncertainty abounds.

    **** that. At least the now makes the strongest possible general impression of reality which makes it harder to de-construct.

    But, as I said, the fact that Froch's ranking was reasonable (as I see it) helps to put my mind at ease.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,654
    21,954
    Sep 15, 2009
    It isn't so much re writing rankings as recognising that the rankings were ridiculous.

    Bute was ranked higher than Froch going into the super 6, it was only convenience that allowed Froch to move higher because of the high profile nature of the winning fight.

    Yes Froch did go on to beat both Bute and Kessler but that is a retrospective ****ysis, at the time Ward, Bute and Kessler were all considered superior to Froch.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    Froch beat Pascal, Taylor and Dirrell then lost a close arguable one to Kessler before beating Glen Johnson.

    Bute was not beaten - but he didn't fight guys that were as good, either: Miranda, Brinkley, Magee, Mendy, Johnson.

    I can see why someone might argue that Bute could be ranked higher here; i've no problem with it, there is a loss after all. But Froch was coming on very very strong.

    But the idea thinking otherwise is "ridiculous" is not acceptable to me.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,654
    21,954
    Sep 15, 2009
    Obviously we know Froch was the next best SMW behind Ward but back then he was coming off a loss and Bute was considered better than him.

    by ridiculous I don't mean the concept of ranking Froch above Bute was ridiculous, I meant that the manner in which they changed the rankings to crown above new champion was ridiculous.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    Not universally, obviously.

    The ranking was reasonable. If the ranking was reasonable there's absolutely no problem with acknowledging it.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,565
    83,428
    Nov 30, 2006
    It wasn't reasonable, though, Mac.

    Ridiculous may be a bit ham-fisted (there have been worse rankings), but flat-out "wrong" suits.

    Kessler had a recent h2h victory over Froch. Neither of Froch's wins in the intervening year-plus ought to have really negated that (although combined, they did carry more weight than Kessler's one follow-up victory over Bouadla)

    Bute (at least, if not Kessler) over Froch is a must at that particular juncture in time - for reasons upon which I elucidated already, none of which have been negated. The position of Froch ahead of him as of right then is really indefensible. Not reasonable. Anything you might use to argue otherwise relies upon events that unfolded after that point in time. Based on recent form, as of then, Froch had no case to be ahead of Bute. If there's one to be reasonably made, I'd love to hear it...but I haven't yet. I just keep hearing everything reduced to "Well that is how the Ring had it" and "it wasn't unreasonable". The Ring was dead wrong on this one, and that's fairly plain to see.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    No.

    Kessler had lost to Ward. Then Kessler beat Froch on a narrow decision. Then Froch beat the favourite for the Super Six (Abraham). The question then is - does beating Abraham - not in retrospect, not knowing what we know now, then - does beating Abraham as his status was then allow Froch to leapfrog Kessler after dropping a narrow decision in his country. The answer may be yes and it may be no, but after he beat Glen Johnson, what is his status? Froch has now beaten Super-six favourite Abraham, then Glen Johnson, while Kessler has done what in the same period? Beaten Mehdi Bouadla. Froch has done the better work, by some distance because Abraham AND Johnson is considerably better work than JUST Bouadla. By distance.

    Their answer was yes, and that's a reasonable position. It's not a "wrong" position. And on this occasion it'd be my position too.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,565
    83,428
    Nov 30, 2006
    Favorite for the Super Six?? Come on... According to whom??

    That, I would call ridiculous.

    Abraham hadn't even debuted at the weight. Anybody who called him the favorite heading into the S6 (as opposed to proven world class super middleweight Kessler) was as wrong as the Ring are for calling Froch #2 when he met Ward.

    I remember a few loonies suggesting they favored Abraham to become tourney king and I laughed them off, because that was loony talk even then. I never thought all that much of him even at middleweight (and was disappointed that he never jumped in the fray with Pavlik and Taylor, at the weight to prove which of them was the best of the 160lb champs of that era) and there was absolutely no reason to believe he was going to move up and be a better 168lber than Kessler.

    Dirrell and Ward, alright, they were green prospects. So if you want to say that perception for some was that a champion a division south would be seen as having more of a chance than a couple of kids that hadn't stepped up in class yet, fine. As for Taylor, he was coming off that brutal and bitterly disappointing ahead-on-the-cards knockout loss to Froch. So you can say Abraham was favored more so than any of them, and was 3rd most likely to succeed. I don't see any reasonable case - and this is going by where things stood back then (and was my opinion back then) - for Abraham being favored in the S6 more than Froch, let alone Kessler.

    That argument is worthless, sorry.
     
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,569
    16,099
    Jul 19, 2004
    If you recall, I always thought Froch was #2 going into the Bute fight, and my reasoning always stemmed from the fact that he was the de factor number 2 for doing what he did in the Super 6, while Bute did virtually nothing, and Kessler dropped out due to injury, and was clearly sliding.

    My opinion was not entirely merit based, and largely stemmed from having no faith in Bute and for admiring The Cobra's run, despite his loss to Kessler in what was the most entertaining bout of the entire tournament.

    As for Abraham being the favorite, I recall Kessler being the clear cut favorite, with some others claiming the 2 favorites were "Kessler and Abraham", but I never understood why a small minority faction was so high on Abraham myself. There were some who were, to be sure, but I recall far more voices favoring Kessler going on.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    Bookies. It's in Boxing Monthly again this month, I think.

    But it doesn't really matter, because the point still stands. If he wasn't favourite it wouldn't matter - he's still two parts of the biscuit that Froch bit to overhaul Kessler's standing, if he did, which I think he did and Ring thinks he did.

    I'm sick of defending Ring's ranking now, so that will be my last word on the matter. I don't care if people personally rank x or y higher than someone else, but this idea that it's incorrect, strange, wrong, ridiculous whatever word you want to use, that's just crazy. It was extremely close not between three of them but between four of them at that exact point.

    Yes, Froch could be ranked fourth.

    Yes, Froch could be ranked second.
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,565
    83,428
    Nov 30, 2006
    Froch couldn't be second, no. Bute was, for reasons I've stated, pretty cut and dry ahead of him on paper - and it wasn't close. And no, Abraham & Johnson (squeaking by Johnson at that, with Bute comfortably defeating him) don't override the h2h victory Kessler had over Froch, in his own country or not, and however close you thought it was. A h2h win on paper is a h2h win on paper and beating an up-jumped one-dimensional middleweight champ in his sop****re effort at 168lbs and then squeaking by Johnson (who Bute handled with relative ease) doesn't erase that h2h win. It trumps Bouadla, sure, but that h2h win looms and would take a lot more than what Froch did in the meantime to counteract. So really it wasn't even close between Kessler and Froch. He was #4 at best, end of. If you want to anoint Ward based on it being a #1 vs. #4 meeting, that's one thing, but Froch wasn't #2, I don't care what Ring said.

    But alright, we're going nowhere. :lol:
     
  12. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    :lol:

    Tyson Fury ranked #2 contender at heavyweight !
    How did this occur ?
     
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,565
    83,428
    Nov 30, 2006
    Don't even!!!!! :-(
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,022
    48,138
    Mar 21, 2007
    There's nobody on that list that should inarguably be above him (who isn't). There just isn't. It's a weak division and the only guys on there I would say is guaranteed to beat him is Wlad and Povetkin - I would also expect Pulev to beat him but he just got stiffened.
     
  15. Ranialove

    Ranialove Member Full Member

    147
    0
    Feb 3, 2015
    :bart:think