The Transnational Boxing Rankings

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Dec 13, 2012.


  1. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Why? You want a few puffs?
     
  2. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    I normally have no issues with the TNBR rankings. Usually they're pretty good and I regularly refer to them.

    That said, I would just like a little clarification on McGrain's "P4P" list beyond the vague and nonsensical explanation I've received so far...
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,561
    21,927
    Sep 15, 2009
    No I want you to stop with the nonsense.

    No LHW should be standing toe to toe with Kovalev. It's a ridiculous game plan and only a crack addict would think otherwise.

    1+1=2
     
  4. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Darnell Boone, a *middleweight*, dropped Kovalev and won the fight on one of the judges scorecards in going the distance with him in the first fight.

    If Boone could have so much success, just imagine what a big and very powerful LHW like Michael Moorer would have done to Kovalev. Moorer would have sent Kovalev back to Russia on his ass and separated from his senses...
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    I don't have a p4p list.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    You don't fight...you get stripped...you need to prove yourself before you are reintroduced.

    This is nothing new; if you haven't understood before you won't now - but that's it and that's all there is to it.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    I have a question for you.

    Why do you think TBRB, Ring, Fightnews, BS, Boxing News, BoxNation and ESPN have Golovkin in the top ten? If he's a "bum" who has only fought "tomato cans", why does this occur?
     
  8. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    So where did that list come from?
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Transnational Boxing Ranking's Board. This is the deepest board for boxing rankings every assembled and the extensive membership, drawn from multiple continents can be seen here:

    http://www.tbrb.org/members/
     
  10. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Fair enough.

    Ward's last opponent is on par with Bumlovkin's recent opposition. However, you seem to have no problem defending both Bumlovkin's P4P ranking and Ward's absence from the list.

    So, if indeed you have no problem with Bumlovkin being in the top 10 P4P, I'd like to ask; Exactly WHAT has Bumlovkin proven lately? Ever?
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Whatever he's proven, it's to the entire boxing world, reflected by his near universal p4p ranking across the board.
     
  12. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    That's an easy question to answer. Politics.

    Bumlovkin doesn't even have the best resume among active fighters @ 160. His inclusion in the top 10 P4P only proves that the politics of boxing promote certain fighters who have the right connections over less politically connected yet more deserving fighters. That's exactly why Bumlovkin and Kovalev are high on some P4P lists. Its also a case of some if not most of the so-called "boxing media" generally not having a clue.

    Those who have a say in the rankings @ the TBRB really ought to strive to do better and not let politics dictate rankings. Haven't we seen enough of this from the sanctioning mobs? I though you guys were supposed to be different...
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,016
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    So you think ALL these people are picked off by politics?

    This basically amounts to a conspiracy theory, doesn't it?

    That being the case means only that i'm talking to someone that believes I'M in a conspiracy theory...which means there's basically no point in continuing this conversation.

    I'm personally satisfied that Golovkin belongs in the top ten p4p; however, when I say that to you, you're able to dismiss it by virtue of the fact that i'm compromised by "politics". This is no more or less valid than my dismissing your opinion because I feel you are involved in "politics."

    For the record, nobody that i know of that is in the fifty strong panel that makes up TBRB is compromised by something called "politics". They just think Golovkin is a beast.

    That, probably, is what's going on with the rest of the boxing world. Probably. Just saying.
     
  14. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    I'm not asking the whole of the boxing world. I'm asking you; Exactly WHAT has Bumlovkin proven lately? Ever?
     
  15. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    At one point the whole of the Western world thought the Earth was flat.

    Yes, sometimes groups of people can be collectively WRONG - for whatever reason.


    And yet when I ask you directly to justify Bumlovkin's lofty ranking on the P4P list your response essentially amounts to "because all these people over here say so". Lol. Do you not see a problem here? Perhaps, if you want to be taken seriously, you can come up with a justification for Bumlovkin's P4P ranking other than "because these people over here say so". Lol..