The true technician

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Irish Fire, Aug 31, 2008.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    What about Ken Norton? I would say he was a fine technician. Even Ali and Holmes couldnt beat him by more than 1 point.
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,169
    53,597
    Feb 11, 2005
    Jersey Joe was more cute than a technician. Obviously, his technique did not save from many losses.

    Joe Louis had the greatest offensive arsenal presented in the division. For their respective places in the development of the sport, Corbett, Johnson and Tunney rank high. Also, I would like to mention Riddick Bowe, who for a short while demonstrated great skill and technique, good at distance and really good in close.
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005

    He suffered the whitaker syndrome. Alot of judges didnt like his style, but in actuality he was clearly outfighting his opponents. too much walcott waltzing caused him "in the eyes of judges" to lose the louis I and maxim I bouts, but according the nearly every ringsider/newspaper/fan poll walcott clearly deserved the decision.
     
  4. lfsdan

    lfsdan Active Member Full Member

    528
    0
    Feb 11, 2005
    Tye Fields without question.
     
  5. HawkFan16

    HawkFan16 Unshot/In My Prime Full Member

    3,511
    4
    Jun 16, 2008
    Obviously Golota-He combined handspeed, a great jab, some power, and extensive knowlededge of the weak points of the body unlike anyone else!:D
     
  6. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    andrew really had great potential
     
  7. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    what about sonny liston?

    according to many great sources he was excellent at both boxing and going on the attack.
     
  8. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    ezzard charles has a claim

    his best was at 175
     
  9. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    475
    Oct 6, 2004
    I doubt anyone will agree with me, but i think that Rocky Marciano is the most purely technically correct boxer. His guard was always high and in the correct position. He always put 100% of his body behind every single punch. His footwork was sound. He wasnt as fast, as accurate or as flashy as many others, but he was technically better than most if not all, imo. It makes sense too. Physically he wasnt the most gifted ever, yet it is arguable that he was the best hitter, the fittest etc. I believe that most of his attributes were enhanced, because he was so technically good at the style he employed. Which is, incidentally, probably the most basic, most successful and the most commonly taught style of boxing.
     
  10. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    322
    Dec 12, 2005
    Toadboy has manlove.
     
  11. SteveO

    SteveO MSW Full Member

    4,255
    14
    Feb 4, 2007
    [YT]lmSv-CbrkVk[/YT]

    Leon Spinks