The Truth about Naseem Hamed

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Cepillo, Oct 26, 2011.


  1. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    nas was a mothafuggin' legend
     
  2. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    14,484
    3
    Oct 12, 2010
    God bless you mods :bowdown
     
  3. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    I have a Masters Degree in Creative Writing. If I use a particular word it's for a particular reason and I'm not looking for advice. Thanks.
     
  4. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    This content is protected

    :lol:
     
  5. Slacker

    Slacker Big & Slow Full Member

    6,774
    3
    Sep 19, 2009
    I also have a Masters Degree, and I am a fiction writer.

    If you don't want advice perhaps you shouldn't say things like "Anyone like to share thoughts in my thoughts?"

    Oh, wait... that was more "advice". Sorry. :patsch

    Anyway, your are welcome for me taking the time to read your work and actually post an intelligent and coherent response.


    I guess instead I should have just said something stupid about *****s and *******s, slick black fighters and the term "FLOORED".

    :roll:
     
  6. Money

    Money Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,968
    20
    Apr 29, 2008
    my god what a ridiculous apologetic Hamed piece.
     
  7. creationstory

    creationstory Member Full Member

    222
    0
    Oct 24, 2011

    seriously? wow!
     
  8. Atritionist

    Atritionist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,473
    0
    Apr 7, 2008
    Good writing. But you make it sound like Wayne McCullough had gone the distance with Morales before fighting Naz :nono.

    And to be honest with you Kevin Kelly's best days we're past him when he faced Hamed. The excuse that Hamed was not focused for the
    Barrera is Bullocks, that was his biggest fight! How was he not going to take that fight serious. If you are going to dedicate a big fight like that to Islam, you are going to came ready. To dedicate a big fight to Islam is serious.

    Prince Naz was very entertaining to watch. His reflexes we're phenominal, including his power. But I do not see him as an All Time Great, my honest opinion.
     
  9. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Hamed's reflexes get greatly overblown. He was such an exaggerated upper body mover that when he was able to avoid the blows it often looked spectacular, but he was caught just as often, and that exaggerated movement often led to the punches he was hit with looking a lot more damaging then they were. Jabs would send his head flying back.
     
  10. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Apologetic?


    Naz was a boxer not a Nazi.
     
  11. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    "Hamed’s peak came in the two years after capturing his first title. By the time he fought Marco Antonio Barrera in 2001, Hamed was past his best. He’d split with his long-time trainer, earned more than he could spend, and achieved many childhood dreams. Hamed was unmotivated, unfocused and lazy in the build-up to his first fight with a truly elite opponent."

    Stop reading right there ..What were the odds there for that fight ?

    Talk about an excuse of epic proportions ..He would have never beat Barrera with his style !
     
  12. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Controversial but I believe it's definitely true Naz was past his best. Barrera's style (and tactics) made it difficult for Hamed to win on points, but Barrera wasn't unstopable and by that time hand injuries had taken their toll and Naz's power wasn't once what it was. '95 Hamed was superior to the Hamed Barrera beat.
     
  13. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    Hamed was past his best against Barrera in 2011 but in 2001 he wasn't ,he was also a 3-1 betting favorite ..Blame the loss on his hands all you want ,I blame it on his lousy boxing ..
     
  14. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    I'm not blaming the loss on anything. It is what it is. Just saying that '95 Hamed was 'the best' version so '01 was "past best." by a good few years.
     
  15. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Hamed's balance was both a strength and a weakness. It allowed him to invest his entire body in a punch and therefore gave him excellent one-punch power, but it also left him vulnerable to counters from technically proficient boxers with the skills to exploit his hands-down approach. His reflexes were decent, but I tend to agree with your original point. Although I'd lose the "greatly"