The truth about Pacquiao v Hatton

I don't have one obviously since the official stats were never released, I am simply going from memory of what was being bandied about at the time. "Until then that fight was a flop", that's rather convenient, guilty until proven innocent. The truth is nobody can prove it one way or the other, but 850,000 seems reasonable to me at about 60% of the Mayweather views (unless you think most of them were watching Mayweather who nobody knows over here). Also bearing in mind the 700,000 for Bruno-Tyson II and the fact Hatton is better and probably more popular than Bruno.

 

Pacquiao is the bigger name and the better fighter he is entitled to 55-45 split.

 

[quote="TKO";3301920]I don't have one obviously since the official stats were never released, I am simply going from memory of what was being bandied about at the time. "Until then that fight was a flop", that's rather convenient, guilty until proven innocent. The truth is nobody can prove it one way or the other, but 850,000 seems reasonable to me at about 60% of the Mayweather views (unless you think most of them were watching Mayweather who nobody knows over here). Also bearing in mind the 700,000 for Bruno-Tyson II and the fact Hatton is better and probably more popular than Bruno.[/quote]

You also have to consider that Tyson is more popular(even in the U.K) than Hatton and Malignaggi combined. I highly doubt Hatton/Malignaggi did 850K.

 

I was just messing with you papa......:yep

 

It surely will do now, it appears as though Manny does want this one above all others and was just posturing and engaging in some brinksmanship in order to get a bigger cut of the purse....I'm sure Hatton will accept the fight now that Pac has agreed to 52-48 as is being reported...

 

Its called Hype.

 

[quote="TKO";3301920]I don't have one obviously since the official stats were never released, I am simply going from memory of what was being bandied about at the time. "Until then that fight was a flop", that's rather convenient, guilty until proven innocent. The truth is nobody can prove it one way or the other, but 850,000 seems reasonable to me at about 60% of the Mayweather views (unless you think most of them were watching Mayweather who nobody knows over here). Also bearing in mind the 700,000 for Bruno-Tyson II and the fact Hatton is better and probably more popular than Bruno.[/quote]

A man with common sense would know if it was a flop or not... the mere fact that it wasn't released says it was.

And please don't use the bruno-tyson reference...because if hatton was fighting a man named tyson he could have made more PPV buys than that.

Tyson is a draw anywhere in the world!

 

No he's not

He is very poppular absolutely but to say he is more so then hatton in the uk is bollox. The majority of casual fans love hatton over here :good He is one boxer that you could go up and ask someone who has never seen a fight and they would of heard of him, unlike say carl froch or junior witter etc.........

Id say he was the most poppular british fighter that i remember and ive been watching boxing for 23 years:bbb

 

**** off. Not one person in the U.K(who doesn't live under a rock) doesn't know who Mike Tyson is. I don't give a **** about Hatton's phoney nice guy persona. Mike Tyson is one of the most well known athletes world wide.

 

Yeah he is known world wide

as a ****** :rofl oh and as lennox lewis *****

 

tyson even fought in Japan! lol it was jam packed!