The Ultimate & Full Proof Way To Eliminate Poor Judging & Judges...

Ya I guess.

It would have fixed the Oscar/Tito fight as well where the guy was giving rounds at the end to Oscar to cover up.

Like PH|LLA said though it is still a corruptible system. Like if 1 judge is blindly giving rounds to 1 of the fighters. Then in a close round any time one of the other judges goes with that fighter he will win the round.

 

There's a major problem with this. There are a lot of fights where there's a close but clear outcome, i.e. 115-113 for a fighter on two judges cards, but then one crazy/inept/corrupt judge scores it massively the other way for some strange reason. On your system, averaging out the cards would allow the guy who won to get jobbed. It's a lot easier to corrupt people that way.

 

Didn't Dirrell himself concede the 12th round? If the fighter himself thinks he lost the round why do you keep arguing that it was a crystal clear round for Dirrell?

 

you're so stooooopid.
all your dumb idea would not stop a crooked judge. example say there is a close fight. but there is a clear winner. say that winner on a fair card should be up by 2 points. two judges see it that way with a 2 point margin. then along is judge number three who sees it for the other guy by an 8 point margin. by your method, judge number three gets averaged in with the other two and the wrong guy wins the fight.
your new system makes it possible to gain decision via buying off only one judge. congratulations, you just made it cheaper to cheat.

 

You see things like me. :good

 

See, some one else talking sense. The current system is, you have to convince at least 2 of the 3 judges that you won the most rounds, it's not complicated, it aint perfect, but neither is any other way to score a fight when it's SUBJECTIVE!

 

I think this might work if there are 5 judges instead of 3. With 3 it would seem too easy for 1 judge to influence close rounds.

As somebody said as well, there really needs to be 1 body with responsibility for training, providing and monitoring judges.

I like the idea with being more liberal with the 10 point system. It would by no means remove corruption or bad judges with, in fact it would give them more power to screw a fighter, but it would reward fighters for good rounds and remove ambiguity over close rounds.

 

I think you're making too much out of this.

If the sole purpose of your scoring idea is to eliminate the insane judge then you've bunked yourself because you need that Italian judge to make scores works out in your favor since he's the one agreeing with the Mexican judge for the majority of the fight.
If you want to call a judge inept at scoring then take his score out entirely - and you wind up with Froch as the winner.

 

Good idea......

 

what do you think of my idea wwm. IMO its the best way to avoid controversies

 

excellent idea WWM!