Who's performances went the farthest both ways, for good and bad? Was was capable of the worst and the very best? Roberto Duran's a great example of this, if not one of the best. But massive weight gain, drugs, and general disinterest will do that to you. And on a very related note, Kirland Laing.
Duran's inconsistency started after his 70th fight. He was at one point 68-1, let's not forget that. I think it a bit unfair to emphasize his inconsistency without at least qualifying it. Few modern fighters go beyond 50 fights total and even fewer had a career that spanned 5 decades.
Yes, but look at Duran's longevity. The big picture, and the success he enjoyed even in his late 30's and into his 40's. It's very obvious he wouldn't of suffered like he did even after his 70th fight if his weight and drugs didn't take a certain edge away from him at times.
How many fighters do you know who competed at the world class level into their 40s? I can think of three right away -Robinson, Moore, and Duran. Duran's edge was dependent on his passion. He was a passion fighter. Watch him when he was a youth -he could barely contain that energy. But see, energy burns out with age. Only sporadically could he get inspired enough to give great performances after a quarter of a century in combat.... You can count his inspired performances after Barkley on one hand. Camacho I. That's about it. The other wins were because Duran could fight without training, half-asleep, and based on memory alone.
Yes, but wouldn't the passion be there if he hadn't just cut 50 pounds in a short period of time to face Leonard a second time? If he wasn't cruising through the star studded 80's on coke and booze? Kirland Lainge never would have happened if neither existed.
Duran was a partier but he wasn't a drug addict. There are no private scandals about the man. But if he was Hopkins-like in his health fanaticism and cold devotion to boxing, he'd have been either greater than he was, or a different fighter altogether and therefore something less. Duran was a passion fighter -take away his personality and you take away his passion.
Who knows -you may be right. I have not heard or read that... his problem was boozing and gluttony. Not really drugs as far as I know.
On a lesser scale all the 80's heavies Dokes, Page, Witherspoon, Berbick etc. Even Holmes got lazy and unispired in supposedly easier defenses.
VERY true. His arrogance and treatment of them sure fired a lot of them. He brought quite a lot of intensity and hostility out of some and when push came to shove Holmes dug deep with the greatest of them. Holmes incredible determination and will to win got him home in many a match he could have fallen in. His rally vs Witherspoon being a pristine example.
Extremely well said, John Thomas. No one seemed to like Holme's back then then, not even the fighters. But then again, he was a long standing champion and dominated the division fr a long time. So on top of being an ******* everyone wanted his scalp and title. People fault him for his performances vs. Carl William's, Renaldo Snipes, Tim Witherspoon... And they at the same moment ignore that those fighters if for only one night usually brought their very best against Holmes.