The Video Pac and Arum don't want you to Watch!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ricardinho, Mar 10, 2010.


  1. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Which logically means he is taking them.

    Brilliant deduction, genius.
     
  2. PISTOL STARTER

    PISTOL STARTER Fear noone but GOD!!! Full Member

    116
    0
    Aug 20, 2008
    Manny is juicing ....shut the fark up and stop whinning u sound like a frikkin chihuahua
     
  3. ???

    ??? Active Member Full Member

    1,144
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    I've never said that urine detects everything. I've said urine detects all steroids. EPO can also be detected in urine. What you need blood tests for is to measure the hematocrit (%red blood cells) for evidence of doping or EPO use. You don't have to actually find exogenous EPO to know that someone is using. The hematocrit will give it away.

    In order to benefit from EPO, the user would have to have an elevated hematocrit during the event. If your red blood cells are back to normal, you haven't gained anything. EPO has a long lasting effect of up to several weeks on red blood cell production, even though the compound itself clears very quickly. This sounds perfect with a 24 day cutoff for blood testing, because Manny could inject after the blood draw on day 24 and have a nice elevated hematocrit for the fight. The only problem then is how to get around the post-fight blood test he readily accepted.

    It's good to know that you admit you are unwilling to arm yourself with facts and prefer to spout off opinions with no scientific backing.

    There is an accepted urine test for EPO.
     
  4. ???

    ??? Active Member Full Member

    1,144
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    I took the time to show you how the author of the video's lack of sound reasoning and any factual accuracy was readily apparent. You still haven't explained to me how my refutation to the points in the video reinforces the need for random blood testing and weakened my position. The guy that made the video was trying to build a case for steroid abuse, for crying out loud. I hope at the very least you'll admit just how absurd the steroid theory is at this point.
     
  5. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,070
    35,188
    Jun 23, 2005
    Excellent points.:good
     
  6. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    He popped positive?!?!?

    Source?
     
  7. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
  8. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,729
    0
    Jan 4, 2010
    I see your point Divac. It will definitely provide a higher chance of catching cheats. However let's quantify that...

    A. Pac's offer: Unlimited random urine testing, random blood test up to 24 days before the fight and right after the fight.
    B. PBF's : Random urine and blood tests 14 days into the fight.

    The increase in chance to caught any PEDs by insisting on a 14 day cut off instead of 24 days is marginal. Because we really don't know if such a designer drugs exist that could cycle in that window. Compounded with the chance that Team Pacquiao has access to it, and so on.

    You see we are trying to get a compromise here to get he fight done. And I think if you look at the circumstances of the situation, what Pac's team put on the table is already a very good compromise on their part.

    edit: I forgot about the Olympic blood testers. Nobody tested positive yet on blood . But many failed urine tests. This is exactly how I mean.
     
  9. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009
    When you are assigned a random urine test you can do what Lance Armstrong did... go take a 2 to 3 hour shower and then submit to your test... certain blockers can be taken with hours of notice to mask the roids. This fact alone indicates a urine test is a joke. I have never said I am 100% certain but each week the communications out of his camp don't help.

    Testing his weight loss contestants for peds.

    Texas not testing him for drugs

    He does little to silence his critics
     
  10. fighter86

    fighter86 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,062
    62
    Jun 17, 2006
    There's ped's in every sport...if Pac was to knock Clottey out within 3 rounds ,he's on something I don't care what people say. whats wrong with boxing is that its not a team sport and its hard to regulate areas in the sport that needs attention. If Nevada grants Holyfield a boxing license again something is wrong with boxing and its becoming like the old days of boxing where corruption is starting to peak.
     
  11. ???

    ??? Active Member Full Member

    1,144
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    So you're still going on about steroids?

    Instead of just making stuff up, you'd do well to base your claims on facts. There is no "2-3 hour" grace period in Olympic-style testing where an athlete enjoys their privacy and is free to take "certain blockers" to test clean. From the time of notification of a requirement to provide a urine sample, an official rep will accompany the athlete until the sample is provided.

    Have a look here and see for yourself:
    WADA:
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xE_JFWSdO2g[/ame]

    USADA:
    http://www.usada.org/resources/usada-videos/popup-video.asp?video=SampleCollection

    Pacquiao was willing to have not just random, but unlimited urine testing. Meaning, he was prepared to give urine every single day if need be. According to you, he'd just keep loading up on these mythical steroid masking agents day after day.

    Furthemore, because these masking compounds exist and are so effective, no steroid using boxer should ever get caught by urinalysis--especially when they know a post-fight urine sample will be tested. Even if unannounced, they could just delay the test and pop some blockers, right? You really have to be committed to ignoring facts and sound reasoning to buy this theory.
     
  12. ricardinho

    ricardinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,241
    3
    May 17, 2009

    This content is protected


    If one follows the proper protocol their body will still reap the benefits of the ped's although they will still test negative through urine--- this is a fact!

    Have a look here and see for yourself:
    WADA:
    If urine is sufficient why does the wada video disclose that blood samples might be taken? Because under wada guidelines blood may be required. The fact that Pac consents to random urine tests hardly would have put him under total wada compliance.

    the wada test for hgh is a blood test follow the link below
    http://www.wada-ama.org/en/Science-Medicine/Science-topics/Q-A-hGH/

    Per Wada there is currently no urine test for hgh their answer as to the possiblilty of a test is : According to the majority of international experts, the blood matrix is the most suitable matrix for the detection of hGH.
    hGH in urine is found in extremely small quantities (less than 1% than that found in blood).
    WADA is collaborating with research teams to explore the development of urine-based detection methods for hGH.

    Concerning epo testing wada says:
    "... This report also recommended that urine testing be used in conjunction with blood screening for a variety of reasons, including the cost savings of performing blood screening prior to testing urine. Some International Federations still use both urine and blood matrices for the detection of EPO. ..."

    also people are manufacturing designer epo that is more difficult to test for:

    they say "WADA is very much aware of the development of new EPOs and biosimilar EPOs in an expanding market. A number of these new EPOs and biosimilar EPOs are well known and can be detected through current tests.
    In addition to constantly refining the existing detection method for EPO and trying to anticipate doping trends, including by closely cooperating with pharmaceutical companies at very early stages of the development of molecules or substances, WADA is currently considering detection methods for EPO that will supplement the existing one and will maximize chances of detecting recombinant EPOs in athletes’ samples. It is important to remember that samples can be stored and later re-analysed as science advances. (The statute of limitations set forth in the World Anti-Doping Code is 8 years.)
    In order to further improve detection of abnormal blood profiles, WADA is leading the development of a strategy against doping in sport called the "Athlete Passport", which is based on the longitudinal follow-up of an athlete's biological variables. The objective of this strategy, which will be added to other anti-doping strategies including "traditional" testing, is to detect abnormal variations of determined biological variables in order to better target testing and/or sanction those found with abnormal variations."