The Walls are Closing in on GGG

What makes you think he will fight Jacobs or Derevyanchenko? He already dropped his IBF belt and had a competitive hard fought win over Jacobs. He's most likely going to take the easiet option out of those you mentioned.

 

So he cannot win either way with you can he, admit it if he fights Canelo he's ducking Charlo, if he fights Jacobs he's ducking Andrade and it'll go on and on.

What you should be questioning is why it took the contenders until GGG was 35 until they showed interest.

 

I have a growing suspicion he is going to retire anyway. I honestly think this whole Canelo, Oscar, cheating in many ways debacle has sapped his heart for the game which added to the fact his age and hes unfairly lost all his belts i think he may just not be able to find the will to go again.

 

I r

I really think Golovkin will beat Charlo if they fought. Too much experience and being in there with Canelo twice who has better skills and defense can only make Golovkin better. He should just fight Charlo next and get it over with.

 

But Why? Why Charlo?

I've just named 4 or 5 fighters who are just as proven and fought better opponents....so why Charlo?

If I was Golovkin I'd drop the WBC route as it's as plain as day that bar a KO the WBC will keep Canelo as their champion in every and any way.

There's more options than Charlo and if these options are taken then there is no duck.

 

I thought Murata was better than he is. Happy to admit it.

 

murata a bum? ugh ban this moron. the man won a gold medal at the 2012 Olympics.. he is far from a bum.

 

He's a Lemieux with a gold medal.

 

I already told you why he has to fight Charlo.

 

I agree, as a fan of Golovkin he should go after Charlo and finish his career as a warrior.

 

I can hold my hand to my heart and say Charlo is a better fighter than Murata.

 

Why?

Because otherwise he's "ducking"....log off you joke.

 

I'm a joke? Lol . You're the only one making excuses. All you had to say was Golovkin beats Charlo if they fight, instead of trying to protect him. It makes you look weak.

 

Charlo vs Golovkin is a shootout between two power punches and is probably one of the best match-ups in the division. . That fight has war written all over it.

The fanboy however isn't interested in competitive fights and only want to see their guy win , hence why they will argue night and day why Golovkin shouldn't take the fight.
The fanboy is simply not a real boxing fan

 

I believe GGG does beat Charlo but I've also given examples of why there are other equally just as good if not better options out there yet you are still banging on about how GGG should fight him.

So yell me why Charlo would be better than Jacobs, BJS, Brant, Andrade, Derevyanchenko?