The WBA Heavyweight "Regular Belt" is beyond SAD

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by iceman71, Jul 11, 2015.


  1. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    and this fight proves it

    fat old chagev who owns it is ranked 17 by ratings that actually make sense

    the challenger for this belt was even sadder being ranked #46 :rofl

    anyone calling this guy a heavyweight champion of the world or calling it a world title fight is doing a disservice to boxing

    :-(
     
  2. mirkofilipovic

    mirkofilipovic ESB Management Full Member

    28,390
    39,782
    Jan 7, 2014
    :tired
     
  3. silly_illy

    silly_illy Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,728
    2
    Feb 5, 2008
    Ruslan looked awesome! ....no wonder everyone is avoiding him!
     
  4. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Lets face it, so many belts, titles weight divisions and orgs have watered down a once great sport. There is something like 78 champions in 17 weight classes including interim champions among the 4 major orgs. This does not include other orgs like the IBO nor does it cobsider champion emeritus. Boxing has become professional wrestling. Shine a little glitter and glitz and the masses think fighters today are great. Dont get me wrong, some certainly are. But nobody today needs to actually beat the best to be called a world champion, and that is sad.
     
  5. Ragamuffin

    Ragamuffin Active Member Full Member

    1,194
    239
    Apr 24, 2015
    To think that Muhammad Ali was a WBA champ....................
     
  6. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    This "belt" is more like a mandatory WBA position. It should never be called champsionship but I guess the WBA makes sanctioning money on this non-sense. If it were called what it really is - a title shot eliminator - maybe they make nothing, not sure.
     
  7. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,146
    17,750
    Apr 26, 2006
    There are too many "champions" ....boxing would be much bigger if there was only 1 true champion per weight class
     
  8. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,729
    6,133
    May 2, 2015
    People need to stop taking this belt seriously. It's no different than WBC silver title, just a different name for the #1 challenger.
     
  9. Barry Smith

    Barry Smith Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,570
    23
    Aug 13, 2012
    The whole division is beyond sad.
     
  10. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    They all make sanctioning fees on every belt whether its a regional, national or "world title". Its a racket.
    http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/07/boxings-many-championships-explained/
     
  11. lucky luke

    lucky luke Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,622
    901
    May 18, 2013
    What belt is this SAD? :)
     
  12. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,307
    29,485
    Apr 4, 2005
    It's a sad state of affairs, I thought the titles were already watered down when I started watching boxing now it's become an even bigger joke.
     
  13. Stallion

    Stallion Son of Rome Full Member

    5,561
    347
    May 6, 2013
    Pianeta was a legit top 20, Molina wasn't even top 30.

    It is disservice to boxing to call both Chagaev and Wilder world champions.

    Stiverne vs. Arreola
    Stiverne vs. Wilder
    Wilder vs. Molina
    Wilder vs. Arreola

    Calling those matches title fights is also a great disservice to boxing.