The WBO and their mandatories

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Imperial1, Jan 26, 2015.


  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
    Thats not bad from you HMB. I usually dont find you to be too bright, but that was quite amusing
     
  2. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007


    :lol:

    The queen of spin why did it take Joe 10 yrs to unify when most guys were dominating for 10 yrs?


    Also why didn't the WBO enforce its Mandatories explain this Failey!
     
  3. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Duck I taken the both of you clowns to school this is just for ****s and giggles now you hypocrite
     
  4. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
    :lol:
    Its funny you say this, but I once got a very funny PM from someone who found a debate I was in to be a very convincing arguement and said something amusing like O Pretaurious could do worse than recruiting my services
     
  5. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    please don't make it so easy.

    unbeaten means nothing, the guy you are referring to was unable to even hold onto his EBU title for one fight.
    that means he was unbeaten against BUMS.
    You LIE. Why?


    magee wasn't a future wba champ, he was awarded interim title but promptly lost it straight away I his first proper title shot that followed.
    Failey, you LIE. WHY?


    everyione gives lacy a hard time. YOU LIE.


    he was ****, he promptly won and lost his title instantly like myger did.

    Everything you typed has failed, failey. This is why they are all laughing at you whislt you keep rehashing "no one can reply to my post"
     
  6. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    you write serial posts that are full of failed points and you don't even know it
     
  7. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
    Tell me what greater wins did Toney have at LHW? which is where those fights happened

    Imperial1s answer - .....stutter.....stutter.....duck :lol:
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010

    because joe was waiting for the superior boxer to get injured (ottke or Kessler) and then jump out and challenge them in Cardiff.

    sometimes you have to wait 10 years for that one chance.


    though to be fair,ottke was much more the pro at that cheat game.
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
     
  10. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
    :lol: Okay, yeah you did you rea...l...l...y :zzz:zzz
     
  11. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    joe already had the wbo title when Collins had NO title so what did Collins have to do with it. YOU LIE failey.





    since post prime reid matched joe equally, then perhaps calzaghe is lucky that prime reid didn't fight him, or he would have lost.

    Lets be honest joe didn't want to lose, so he likely didn't want reid when reid was prime.





    joe only fought woodhall when he as retiring with a back injury.





    IN THE AMATEURS?? HAHAHA.

    What bearing does the amateurs that have on when joe attempted to unify?





    probably true, ottke was a pointless titlist at times.







    HA Calzaghe was saved by his Cardiff ref in that fight when Byron slipped the fight was stopped.



    no we don't know that. no one except YOU knows that. that's why we asking you why it took 10 years.
     
  12. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    joe already had the wbo title when Collins had NO title so what did Collins have to do with it. YOU LIE failey.This is not even relevant vaguely to what imperial asked you.


    since post prime reid matched joe equally, then perhaps calzaghe is lucky that prime reid didn't fight him, or he would have lost.
    Lets be honest joe didn't want to lose, so he likely didn't want reid when reid was prime.


    joe only fought woodhall when he as retiring with a back injury. this has nothing to do with unifying the titles.


    IN THE AMATEURS?? HAHAHA.
    What bearing does the amateurs that have on when joe attempted to unify?
    Are you seriously claiming that a fight as a kid amateur stopped adult 30something joe calzaghe trying to unify for 10 years as wbo titlist?


    probably true, ottke was a pointless titlist at times. ottke was the german calzaghe, its been said, only more so.



    HA Calzaghe was saved by his Cardiff ref in that fight when Byron slipped the fight was stopped.

    no we don't know that. no one except YOU knows that. that's why we asking you why it took 10 years.#


    nothing in your post except perhaps ottke is vaguely relevant to imperials question.
     
  13. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007


    He doesn't ever answer the question, he likes to filibuster until you get tired of his rants..


    :lol:
     
  14. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,982
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
    I have to say that I dont bother reading Herols posts anymore after having to correct him for constantly getting facts wrong and then later finding that he hadnt seen fights or fighters he commented on. Im sure if i was to waste my time looking at any post he wrote, it would almost definately be incorrect, and I have wasted alot of time and energy on the fool. He is not relevant, and doesnt get my time, he is a known joke, like another poster who constantly ducks... Back to post #82 :oops::lol:. Still you sometimes come out with an interesting point and I dont think you are completely clueless, so tend to still read your posts a bit
     
  15. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010

    conveniently means you can continue to duck.