the what fights did you watch today\scorecard thread.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mantequilla, Nov 20, 2009.


  1. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,381
    26,639
    Jun 26, 2009
    Will do, champ. Look forward to comparing scorecards.

    Didn’t Coetzee suffer a horrible cut in this one? Or am I thinking of another fight?
     
  2. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,381
    26,639
    Jun 26, 2009
    Gerrie Coetzee vs. Pinklon Thomas, 10 rounds, heavyweights, from Sands Casino Hotel in Atlantic City, N.J., on Jan. 22, 1983.

    Coetzee enters 28-3 (17) and ranked No. 1 by the WBA (the WBC does not rank fighters from South Africa at this point due to apartheid). Thomas enters 20-0 (17) and is ranked No. 7 by both the WBA and WBC.

    Thomas weighs 211 1/2, Coetzee 221 3/4.

    Scoring in New Jersey is on the rounds system, so I’ll abide by that:

    1: Even
    2: Coetzee
    3: Coetzee
    4: Thomas
    5: Coetzee
    6: Thomas
    7: Coetzee
    8: Thomas
    9: Thomas
    10: Thomas

    My card: Thomas 5-4-1

    Official cards: 5-4-1 Coetzee, 4-4-2 and 5-5; majority draw
     
    scartissue likes this.
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,115
    Mar 21, 2007
    Gary Russell MD12 Vasyl Lomachenko

    So much speed. It's actually quite hard to see who is doing what. Lomachenko probably hitting a little harder; it's the Russell jab versus the Lomachenko arsenal. Russell's hands look fast, they are clearly quite well matched, but it is very much the case that Lomachenko is landing the eye-catching punches, especially a right-hook to the body. Russell jabing Lomachenko back in the opening of the third, something's troubled him a bit I think. Russell not going to go away, is looking to contest a bit with Russell. Lomachenko does enough bodywork and backs Russell up for long enough that he takes the third, but it's close.

    Russell's own left hook to the body looks very good in the fourth; this round is evencloser. Lomachenko is gathering the ground, Russell pushing him back with the jab, but Russell gets some good cuffing punches going too when they bump. Huge fifth for Lomachenko, good grief Russell is a tough man. It's strange to see a fighter with so few pro-bouts go up and down with such silk. He opens up the head with the body like a 9 year pro. Double right-hands, up and down. The right hook the real difference maker here but he will bring over the left, too. Russell might have won the battle of the jabs but it's not mattering as much as I felt it should be. Russell's hope is that the amateur will run out of steam. He is getting hurt, hurt to the body though. I think he snuck through in the eighth though landing with volume, but a case for Loma's cleaner work is also compelling. Lomachenko show superb feet in the ninth to stay out of the way of that volume. Gorgeous adjustment. I dunno though, at 1:00 remaining, despite the defence of Lomachenko, I think Russell is ahead. Two in a row for the American and the first round i feel confident about giving him.

    Loma counters his way to the 10th though. Shame. Had a fight on our hands for a minute there. Very clean, very few fouls until the last round when Russell strayed low a couple of times.

    Very good fight, way better than I remember.

    Lomachenko: 1,2,3,5,6,7,10,11,12.
    Russell: 4,8,9.

    117-111.

    Official: 114-114, 116-112x2.
     
  4. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,378
    12,724
    Mar 2, 2006
    We're not far off, my man. We agreed on 8 out of 10 rounds, which is pretty fair. And it was a close fight.
     
  5. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,381
    26,639
    Jun 26, 2009
    I could have gone either way on the first and I really wanted to because I loathe even rounds but so little happened I couldn’t do it ... either guy lands a couple more solid jabs and it would have been his.

    It’s a good fight, a bit cautious at first but they opened up and both had their moments. Wish it had been a 12-rounder but I cannot say a draw was an unfair verdict.
     
    scartissue likes this.
  6. clum

    clum Member Full Member

    397
    707
    Jan 4, 2017
    Shoji Oguma vs. Sung-Jun Kim (7/28/80)
    OOkkOkOOOkkkkOO (143-142 Oguma)

    This is the most obscure of Oguma's title fights, as instead of facing a flyweight great or a H2H nightmare he's up against an ex-champion at light flyweight who's gone 0-2-1 in his last three fights. Kim seems to have the size and the chin to move up to full flyweight, not that Oguma's much of a puncher.

    It's not a dull fight, but the two definitely start out cautiously. Oguma looks to hit and run like he'd done in his title win over Chan-Hee Park, but without charging forward and boring in on the body against the ropes like he usually does. Kim mostly tries to counterpunch, and at times neither guy seems interested in leading. Oguma gets the better of things early simply through speed, as Kim doesn't have much in the footspeed or reaction time. Round seven has some of the most elegant boxing I've ever seen from Oguma, repeatedly tagging Kim while circling him, and in round eight he lands his biggest shots of the fight and looks like he's going to take over.

    Around the tenth Kim gives up on counterpunching and starts trying to get off first, even if it means taking shots in return, and suddenly the fight turns on its ear. Oguma seems to slow a bit, too, and Kim is able to walk him down. He rocks Oguma a couple of times in the twelfth. Next round Oguma does so much backpedaling that Kim mocks him with the Sung-Jun Kim shuffle. I have the champion a point behind now, but he doesn't seem to think he needs the fourteenth. Finally he lands a bodyshot late in the round that backs Kim off, setting up a big exchange of wild infighting on the ropes. They do fight the fifteenth like a winner-take-all round, and Oguma's class shines through as he both outjabs Kim and lands the harder shots. They pound gloves after it's over, and clearly Oguma respects Kim a lot more than he did Park.

    Oguma gets a split decision here (+3, +2, -2), with only the Japanese judge scoring less than half of the rounds as even. Kim didn't do much afterward, and I kind of think that Oguma is past his best here as well, even though he finally puts together a decent championship reign. He seemed more explosive in his late '70s fights up through the first win over Park, but he caught some bad breaks and was fighting better opposition then. Still a good win but not a performance that really enhances Oguma's standing at all.
     
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2020
  7. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,833
    13,126
    Oct 20, 2017
    Rocky Lockridge v Cornelius Boza-Edwards

    Quality fight which was somewhat a passing of the baton from the previous generation of the late 70s/early 80s super featherweights to the new generation.

    Of course, this being a Boza fight it was bound to be exciting and he started well, putting Rocky on his backside in the first, although he wasn't hurt. Boza also threw more and worked harder but Lockridge picked his shots better, countering Boza well and looking more and more in control as the fight wore on. In short, he worked smarter than Boza. It earned him a title shot at Roger Mayweather while that was the last of Boza as a super featherweight and he moved up to lightweight to try and secure a title shot there.

    1 8-10
    2 10-9
    3 9-10
    4 10-9
    5 10-10
    6 10-9
    7 10-9
    8 10-9
    9 10-9
    10 10-9

    Lockridge 97-93 Boza-Edwards
     
  8. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,378
    12,724
    Mar 2, 2006
    Jel, I had picked Boza to win this fight which will tell you what I know. I scored this awhile back, here is what I wrote:

    Here is his 10 rounder with Rocky Lockridge. BTW, I met them both at Caesar's a few days before the fight. Super nice guys.

    Round 1: 10-8 Edwards (scored a knockdown)
    Round 2: 10-10 Even
    Round 3: 10-10 Even
    Round 4: 10-9 Lockridge
    Round 5: 10-9 Lockridge
    Round 6: 10-9 Lockridge
    Round 7: 10-9 Lockridge
    Round 8: 10-9 Lockridge
    Round 9: 10-9 Lockridge
    Round 10: 10-9 Lockridge

    Total 98-93 Lockridge

    Despite what appears to be dominance by Lockridge, every round was competitive. Two great warriors in action.
     
    roughdiamond and Jel like this.
  9. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    After watching Eddie Mustafa piece Marvin Johnson, I thought **** it, why not watch something more positive, and go on a huge Pops binge. First up, the fight with Eddie Gonzales:

    This content is protected

    10 : 9
    10 : 9
    10 : 9 (
    This content is protected
    )
    This content is protected


    I love Marvin. In the second, Eddie was knocked back hard and held up by the ropes. Marv didn't press it, he showed good sportsmanship and let Gonzales get to his feet and they touched gloves. The second they did Marv whipped a left uppercut and a right hook into Eddie and had him reeling. Early stoppage IMO.

    Next up: the first Stewart fight. Marv's crowning achievement IMO. I know he was the first three-time LHW champ, and without checking I think he's the only one (although I'm thinking Kovalev and Hopkins).

    This content is protected

    10 : 9
    10 : 9
    9 : 10 (29/28)
    10 : 9
    10 : 9
    10 : 9 (
    This content is protected
    )
    This content is protected


    Normally I don't like cut stoppages, but I've never said they're not legit wins and in this case Stewart was a mess on both eyes. Plus Marv was winning anyway. Really good fight, though. Rounds 1, 4 &6 were the best here, but not good enough IMO to be put in threads like @Saintpat's and Williams'.

    I'm watching more, but they deserve their own posts.

    I love this guy man. He was so entertaining, and so nice! It's like he was possessed when he got in there. It actually gets on my nerves a bit that both Davis and the Williams fight isn't on YouTube.
     
    roughdiamond, scartissue and Jel like this.
  10. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,381
    26,639
    Jun 26, 2009
    I’m all about some Pops myself.

    Tough thing watching the Saad Muhammad fights is one of them has to lose (yeah I know the outcome but it would be the same if reversed). I feel the same about Yaqui and James Scott. Could watch those guys all day.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  11. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    I'm watching the first Saad-Pops fight right now. It's a great fight but like you said, there's that little thing in the back of your head which is a bit disappointed with the result. And even if it was a draw, it'd still be there.

    It's still probably my favourite fight though.
     
    Saintpat likes this.
  12. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,903
    Mar 3, 2019
    This content is protected


    Probably my favourite fight ever. It's certainly up there in the top three.

    This content is protected

    9 : 10
    10 : 9
    9 : 10
    10 : 9
    9 : 10
    9 : 10 (55/59)
    9 : 10
    9 : 10
    10 : 9
    9 : 10
    10 : 9 (
    This content is protected
    )
    This content is protected


    I don't know what's to dislike here. Both of these guys are super fan-friendly and both fought their hearts out. As for the fight; there's tons of clean, awesome action, big momentum shifts and a come from behind KO. Has to be rated as one of the best ever. Round 4 was the best IMO, and certainly worthy of consideration. However, it wouldn't beat Foreman-Lyle or Chang-Tokashiki. It was amazing though.

    Honestly, the main difference here? Saad had an amazing chin; Johnson didn't.
     
    Jel and Saintpat like this.
  13. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,833
    13,126
    Oct 20, 2017
    Great memories, Scar! Interested to know how you viewed it when you were there in Vegas in '83. Was your perception of the way the fight was unfolding the same as when you scored it more recently?

    I'm not surprised that you had some even rounds and that our scorecards differ a bit. As you say, every round was competitive. Lockridge did the generally cleaner work - his punching was more precise. That was the main difference to me and that got clearer as the fight wore on.
     
  14. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,378
    12,724
    Mar 2, 2006
    Jel, I may have met them at Caesars but I wasn't there for the fight. The whole Pryor-Arguello card was incidental because I was there on my honeymoon and I couldn't abandon the bride. I was across the street at the Flamingo so running across to Caesars was easy but I had to temper it a bit. We would go over there for lunch and I was like a kid in a candy store. But hanging with me for a few years she got to know the fighters running around so she was cool with everything. She even suggested we stay a few more days and take in the fight, but I had to use my noggin with the money starting to dwindle. I actually didn't see the fight until a later tape delay. Great memories, dude. And she still understands when I need to see a fight.
     
    Amos-san, roughdiamond and Jel like this.
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,533
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    Rocky Lockridge has such a deceptive record.

    But then like Glen Johnson the amount of bad decisions he suffered gets over rated.

    Strange.