You mean number of punches landed? Of course judging contains a lot of criteria, like also ring generalship etc. If about am boxing I had some lads when I knew that I should finish them in distance in order to win. One lad was cos he really had power and he did not had boxed like am, everything he threw was with insane power for his size and age. There, yeah, quit or finish him asap in order not to get in hospital. Then some lads who managed to score on me well, one for example like did not hurt but he scored damn well, was more agile and fast, there no hope for me to win him on cards. Some next lad too, i used vs guy stuff called excessive holding and standup wrestling. Ref was very angry. These some examples.
i wish there were more refs like mills lane...any refs like mills lane. by rd 3, he would have told loma if he didnt fight he was gonna start taking points.
Pro boxing judges are different, some value ring generalship higher than others. Some more are about punches landed. Also it is not easy to score a fight at all. Easier is to score if you have view from multiple cameras and might afford to replay with 1/2 and 1/4 speed. If you have 1/2 , 1/4 speed and view from multiple cameras and angles, you have more opportunities to judge in depth. Real time scoring is not easy job.
Again wrong, there are criteria that are considered but it's a game of hitting and not getting hit. Otherwise what's the point of throwing punches. And believe it or not, clean punches is clearly a main criteria considered. And if it isn't then what kind of dumb sport is this? The fact is, it was a low volume round but Loma quite clearly landed several cleaner blows something you implicitly don't want to accept. You talk about Loma not doing anything for the first 2 minutes yet completely forget that Loma was more or less on the outskirts of the center of the ring, and Lopez was not actually throwing that much volume and of that volume he did throw practically nothing landed clean. You seem like you don't want to accept that landing punches is significant seemingly to save some kind of face in this "debate" (aka you trying to downplay the element of clean punching in boxing). "Easy round to score for Lopez" good one so it's an easy round to score for Lopez because he's following a guy around not landing any punches or cutting off the ring effectively whilst getting outlanded with cleaner purposeful blows. Loma did not land more by significant amount but he did land several more punches, and punches that were clean. But all to you if you don't think that's important and keep scoring rounds for fighters who walk forward and land nada. If no one is the clear general (in fact this could go to Loma), and there is no effective aggression then the round should sensibly go the guy who actually landed punches.. Can't believe I even have to say that.. Jesus f christ Many people scored round 2 for Loma and rightfully so You're the perfect example of in denial.
At this point hes basically trolling or rather just arguing to argue. The clearest way to win a round is to stun or hurt the opponent. In most rounds that doesnt happen. So you look to be the aggressor and land cleaner shots. I dont think this guy understands that amatuer boxing is scored via total volume of shots landed. Pro boxing is quality over quantity. Which falls under the clean punching category. Aggression is a scoring criteria whether he likes it or not. The judges scored Lopez Loma wide. In that fight Loma ran away. And the judges said fine, go ahead and run and it bit him in the ass.
ffs, its way past the point where you should have gotten a clue about the reality of who you are. here, and i imagine in life as well. you have absolutely no self awareness. you have no frickin idea who you really are. its hilarious to watch.
Roberto Duran went up and beat Sugar Ray Leonard in his prime. That's an all time great. Losing to a 22 year old Lopez and blaming it on size is not greatness. I nor anyone else with half a brain wants your validation. No one takes you seriously your probably the most embarrassing poster on this board. I read your responses purely for their comedic value
I swear. No one has ever lifted weights or has any comprehension of basic anatomy here. reading the tale of tape like gospels and reading about walk around weights and checking out other dudes biceps an shoulders like wtf is this forum sometimes ahaha.
Define body types mate? Meso Endo Ecto BS a college study made up by looking at naked students? Or looking at shoulders an head sizes? checkin out there "frames" to see if they're big men lol.