The Worst Bum on GGG's boxing resume full of Bums (record of 3-122-5)

"missed the irony in the post"

love it, tell you what, I wont say anything more if you dont too.

 

so trolling is the chosen MO on here. Just when GGG presented the answers everybody was pushing for. He can't do right with you guys can he?

 

Except your attempt at irony was lame and had no purpose other than mindless trolling.

 

that just u missing it makes it worse, but 11/10 for effort mate.

 

The 6-6 score was definitely controversial.

 

I see that as an excuse. GGG is very well preserved for his age. At least much better than fighters his age. Against Jacobs and Canelo the top two MWs he didn't look as impressive, but as soon as he fought a no hoper in Vanes he looked just like his old self, not a least bit different.

See this. He started his pro career much later than most top pro boxers, at 24 years.

As was mentioned he has a relatively easy path to reach where he is now.

He's ONLY fought 196 rounds!! For comparison Mayweather has fought 400, Pacquiao 475, Canelo 374. These top fighters have double or more rounds fought than GGG.

So as long as GGG is still blasting away Vanes, Wade, Rubio type fighters Im not calling him old or past prime just because he struggles against a top fighter.

 

The "so-called" haters.

 

Or maybe it was because I am not a special ed teacher, so I am not used to communicate with socially inept autistic dorks like yourself. And I doubt that anybody here thinks that your attempt at irony was clever and witty. Get a life already you incel loser, you are shitposting here since 2010 and nothing has changed, you are still a sad case.

 

To be honest, I've been bashed nonstop here for saying that gg is a professional tomato can opener. But criticizing this first fight... it's too much even for me.

I've seen way worse. For instace, that's what you do when you want your fighter to have a perfect record, you make him fight fights like this one, third fight:

This content is protected

 

Calm Mr moral authority

 

The rounds argument is a little flawed because all those 300+ amateur fights do count for something as well, maybe not 1 to 1 but definitely something. You can watch the footage online from some of them and some are fairly brutal affairs.

 

all the fighters you listed are better than GGG's debut. You're only helping prove our point

 

There is no excuse for fighting a human bread stick when you’re projected to be world class.

It doesn’t matter what tomato cans were beaten by which other fighters.

 

Yeah, it counts for something, but its not like the pros where they use smaller gloves, no head gear, and to win you usually need to land the harder punches instead of landing more punches than your opponent.

 

Big G fan but most fighters don't have some 300 amateur fights