The Worst German Robbery Yet

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ocelot, Jun 25, 2011.


  1. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    115-113 sturm clear victor, he landed the cleaner punches
     
  2. EnzoRD

    EnzoRD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,697
    172
    Apr 21, 2008
    I suppose it's not a robbery. Sturm could have takent that by 1 round. But no more. Definetely not four.

    If this fight was in the USA. Macklin would have easily won.
     
  3. rocky1

    rocky1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,564
    1
    Oct 26, 2010
    8-4 or 7-5 Macklin the 7-5 is me being nice to Sturm a blatant robbery, anyone who scored that fight to Sturm needs to get there eyes checked the 2 judges who scored it 8-4 to Sturm should never be allowed to judge again.
    The people saying sturm won because he landed the cleaner punches, really he must have got outworked about 3 or 4 to 1 in power punches.
     
  4. 'el nino'

    'el nino' Active Member Full Member

    1,217
    1
    Nov 5, 2009
    116 - 112 was a joke but I had it by one for sturm
     
  5. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,043
    6,340
    May 18, 2006
    That decision should be overturned is someone going allow the Germans this.

    This will continue if no one does anything about it.
     
  6. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Horse**** decision, it was a total robbery. No way that fight could have been any more than a draw for Sturm and even that is giving him every single break and any round that sniffs being close.
     
  7. Jojoba

    Jojoba Member Full Member

    338
    10
    May 31, 2011
    Specsavers are doing 2 for 1. Do ur self a favour.;)
     
  8. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    115-113 sturm clear victor, he landed the cleaner punches, 117-111 is a joke.
     
  9. leighton

    leighton Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,455
    0
    Jun 21, 2009
    If that fight was in the US Macklin would of got the win.
     
  10. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    :thumbsup couldn't agree more
     
  11. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Again, what rounds to Sturm? Clearly not 1-4, as he was completely inactive. That leaves 8 rounds. Did Macklin not win two rounds between 5 and 12? That's absurd. He clearly did. Look at Sturm's face and sides. He got beat up. Pathetic decision.
     
  12. David B

    David B Nazi Russia lies. This is the only truth. Full Member

    39,142
    109,995
    Feb 25, 2006
  13. Christie Bell

    Christie Bell Member Full Member

    132
    0
    May 24, 2011
    A tough call, for me it was Macklin's fight. How many rounds does he need to win by, everyone must win 2 more to be awarded the verdict?

    If the match up takes place UK side, Macklin wins. Macklin UD 115-113.

    Not a great fan of Macklins btw, does nothing particularly special. But, he deserved the verdict on tonights performance. Shouldn't Sturm fight a world champ? Its always contenders, not even top level contenders.
     
  14. itsa huge bitch

    itsa huge bitch Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,264
    1
    Mar 9, 2011
    you clearly dont know how to judge a fight if you scored that
     
  15. One Round

    One Round Hertfordshire's Finest Full Member

    2,964
    15
    Nov 24, 2008
    I had it a draw.

    2 judges coming up with 116-112 or whatever it was reeks of Kraut bull**** though