In a softball profile of Dana White for The Boston Herald, sportswriter Ron Borges falls hook and line for the same inexhaustible fairy tale that the UFC was held on barges and regularly featured groin biting before White and the Fertittas gallantly dragged it from the muck. The fighters spirit [White] learned at McDonoughs was never extinguished as he rewrote UFCs rules to exclude troubling practices like groin shots, eye gouging and head butts, writes Borges. Does the UFC circulate a press kit with this fiction? Probably not: Enough reputable outlets have repeated it enough that Borges probably considered it accurate. But the UFC rules as we know them were more or less in place in New Jersey in 2000, well before White purchased the promotion. Boston was home to White for years, and a little hyperbole isnt so bad. The bigger issue is the consistent portrayal of White as the sole and exclusive engine behind the UFCs success, to the point where any and all history prior to 2001 is either revised or eliminated. In fairness to White, he had a good teacher. Bob Meyrowitz, who ran Semaphore Entertainment Group at the time ad man Art Davie and Rorion Gracie approached the business with the premise for the UFC, was not even in attendance for their first event in Denver. By the time the promotion was turning over hundreds of thousands of pay-per-view buys, Meyrowitz had purchased Davie and Gracies stake and turned himself into its sole creator. It made for a cleaner, better package, with the neat side effect of satiating Meyrowitzs voluminous ego. Sound familiar? Whites story as told through the uncritical lenses of media misses several key points: When a business officer has a near-bottomless well of financial resources to cover their slips, things get easier. Those slips came early and often: UFC 33 was a disaster simply because no one could get a time slot coordinated, as embarrassing an error as any the upstart promotions have managed; heavily oiled marketing campaigns featuring Carmen Electra looked like something youd see in Out, which is a little too demo-specific; Chuck Liddell was lent out to Pride and smashed. Its all rookie, bush-league stuff. The difference? Fertitta could cover the repair bill. Also swept aside is the notion of Zuffa purchasing the UFCs intellectual property when they could have easily started their own banner and saved a couple of million. The reason? Meyrowitz, despite his fumbles, turned the UFC into a highly recognizable brand: the UFC-as-Kleenex analogy started under his watch. For everything White has done, he was working with an incredible asset: eight years of brand placement. If Coca-Cola is hemorrhaging money and a new CEO is able to reverse their fortunes, its an impressive feat -- but it does not mean he invented Coca-Cola. The UFC and MMA as we know it today is the product of many, many people: the Gracies, who popularized the idea of disparate styles meeting in Brazil; the boxers who would consent to fighting a wrestler sporadically throughout the 20th century; Bill Viola, who strapped headgear and pads on martial artists and let them punch and submit each other in Philadelphia at the height of the Toughman craze; Pat Jordan, who wrote a 1989 Playboy article on Rorion that brought Davie to his Academy; Davie and Rorion, who packaged it as a commercial property; SEG, which turned it into a viable television product; Joe Silva, who can make sense of the bigger picture in matchmaking; and White and the Fertittas, who used money and connections to make it digestible to the masses. But thats not a good sound bite, is it? Its long and laborious and probably missing a few more steps. Today, White is fond of statements like, I built this thing. And in many ways, hes right: White figured out how to monetize a business that had the scarlet letter of political oppression and social irresponsibility seared into it. Its a spectacular fourth-quarter comeback, and its impressive enough on its own. So why embellish it? :happy:happy Go Sherdog!!!
who wrote it? jake rossen, wtf?! that guy usually writes the worst type of drivel! I guess if you put a ****** in a room with a typewriter he will eventfully give you Shakespeare is true to an extent.
also the fact that people believe the ufc invented mma in 1993 with ufc 1, that is also bull****! most mma fans have very little knowledge about the sport they claim to love. not that I am professor MMA or anything.
If you want to be technical the early UFC wasnt mixed martial arts anyway. You had different styles vs each other in no holds combat. Either way Dana didnt invent jack ****.
watch the early ufc's like 1-20 then watch the same timeline in japan pancrase fighting was sooooo much better than early ufc's i love the grappling with no gloves, they should bring this back somehow
And? Shamrock was a stud when he was in Pancrase. Additionally the rule set was entirely different to the early UFC's. By the time he arrived in the UFC Ken was just a meat head on gear. In Pancrase he had awesome technique.
they had two fights beebs, zuffa didnt own the ufc then so im sure you still get paid by dana if you concede that pancrase was better at the time.:yep
Better how? The rope grab sub breaks, the boots, or the no punching? It was great, but it was a mixture of what would become MMA and pro wrestling, in fact certain matches were made to look a little better than reality would allow.
I was just joking with you, beebs you can have any preference you want ok:thumbsup It is just funny that you jump down the throat of anyone who prefers another org to the ufc. I only hope that zuffa is more generous with pay to you than their fighters.:tong
Borges plagiarizes so its no surprise that he managed to plagiarize the ZUFFA myth. Rossen is also the king douche of phony MMA journalism.