THERE IS NO WAY TROUT won that fight!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Doc, Apr 20, 2013.


  1. Elite

    Elite Guest

    Your getting senile then.
     
  2. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009

    yeah he did... and missed most of them :rofl:rofl
     
  3. illwill007

    illwill007 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,903
    1
    Apr 10, 2010
    Alvarez won but not as wide as that one judge. Trout seemed hurt every time Canelo let his hands go.
     
  4. HIGHCOLLIDE

    HIGHCOLLIDE Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,752
    0
    Sep 14, 2010
    :patsch
    u should be banned for 3 days and 13 hrs and shot on your big toe for ever putting the name of those 2 boxers in the same sentence.:-(
     
  5. JoeCamelTow

    JoeCamelTow Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,900
    4
    Dec 27, 2010
    Just last week most of those bitching about this fight being a robbery
    were claiming Rigondeux was one of the greatest boxers ever for doing
    to Donaire what Canelo is doing to Trout right there.
     
  6. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    I can always appreciate slick defense:D
     
  7. Elite

    Elite Guest

    :lol: I know.
     
  8. Ianian58

    Ianian58 Active Member Full Member

    680
    2
    Oct 16, 2012
    It's a modern pure boxer and the GOAT pure boxer. Burns is a decent fighter. Nowhere near Pep but my point stands. Lack of power in punches doesn't decide fights- if so Calzaghe pretty much lost all his fights. But in many fights power leads it. I'm pointing out that lack of power doesn't mean punches are worthless.
     
  9. Jai C

    Jai C Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,746
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    Doc, please learn correct English. The term is too, not to. To slick, to ginger is wrong. It's too slick, too ginger. People assume you are a child typing on a keyboard.